Source Jouranl of CSCD
Source Journal of Chinese Scientific and Technical Papers
Included as T2 Level in the High-Quality Science and Technology Journals in the Field of Environmental Science
Core Journal of RCCSE
Included in the CAS Content Collection
Included in the JST China
Indexed in World Journal Clout Index (WJCI) Report
Volume 39 Issue 5
Jan.  2022
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
Abstract
References
Article Navigation >  ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING  > 2021  >  39(5): 80-88
YANG Zhi-hua, ZHANG Rui, LIU Qiong-yu, TAO Yuan, JIANG Jun-ting, TAN Jing, CHENG Jin-jun, YE Xun. ESTABLISHMENT AND CHARACTERISTIC ANALYSIS ON FINE PARTICULATE MATTER SOURCE PROFILE OF OPEN-SOURCES IN WUHAN[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2021, 39(5): 80-88. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202105011
Citation: YANG Zhi-hua, ZHANG Rui, LIU Qiong-yu, TAO Yuan, JIANG Jun-ting, TAN Jing, CHENG Jin-jun, YE Xun. ESTABLISHMENT AND CHARACTERISTIC ANALYSIS ON FINE PARTICULATE MATTER SOURCE PROFILE OF OPEN-SOURCES IN WUHAN[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2021, 39(5): 80-88. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202105011
shu

ESTABLISHMENT AND CHARACTERISTIC ANALYSIS ON FINE PARTICULATE MATTER SOURCE PROFILE OF OPEN-SOURCES IN WUHAN

doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202105011

  • 1. Hubei Key Laboratory of Industrial Fume and Dust Pollution Control, Jianghan University, Wuhan 430056, China;

  • 2. Suichang Branch of Ecological and Environmental Bureau of Lishui City, Suichang 323300, China;

  • 3. Hubei Jiutai Safety and Environmental Protection Technology Ltd, Shiyan 442000, China

  • Received Date: 2020-04-20
    Available Online: 2022-01-17
    Abstract
  • Fine particulate matter (PM2.5) samples from four kinds of open-sources (soil dust, construction dust, road dust and yard dust) in Wuhan were obtained by re-suspension sampling method, then the content of inorganic elements, water-soluble ions and carbon fractions of samples were analyzed. On this basis, the source profiles of PM2.5 for four kinds of open-sources in Wuhan were established. The results showed that crustal elements were the primary components in PM2.5 source profiles of open-sources and accounted for 62.69%~80.14% of the total chemical compositions, which was obviously a natural background feature. The results revealed that Si and Al were the relatively high constituents in soil dust, and the contents of Ca and OC in PM2.5 of construction dust were significantly higher than other three kinds of sources. Ca, Si and OC were the main composition in PM2.5 of road dust, and the main composition in PM2.5 of yard dust were Si and Ca. Ca, Cu and Zn were strongly enriched in construction dust, road dust and yard dust, respectively, and each of the enrichment facts(EF) was all greater than 20, which suggested that the influence of man-made sources was significant. OC was the dominating part of carbon fractions of source profiles, and all the values of OC/EC were greater than 2, indicating that open-sources had a certain influence on the formation of secondary aerosols. The divergence coefficient among four kinds of source profiles was between 0.29 and 0.47, and the correlation coefficient was between 0.19 and 0.97. The similarity between soil dust and the other three kinds of source profiles was not high. Relatively high similarity were observed among yard dust, construction dust and road dust, and these three kinds of sources had extremely strong collinearity. The establishment of refined PM2.5 source profiles of open-source in Wuhan could provide scientific support for PM2.5 source apportionment, and also provide important references for the prevention and control of open-sources in Wuhan.
    • FullText(HTML)
    • References(42)
  • [1]
    中国环境监测总站. 环境空气颗粒物来源解析监测方法指南(试行)[EB/OL]. 2版. http://www.mee.gov.cn/.2014-2-28.
    [2]
    北京市生态环境局. 最新科研成果新一轮北京市PM2.5来源解析正式发布[EB/OL]. http://sthjj.beijing.gov.cn/bjhrb/xxgk/jgzn/jgsz/jjgjgszjzz/xcjyc/xwfb/832588/index.html.2018-5-14.
    [3]
    上海市环保局. 上海公布大气颗粒物源解析结果[EB/OL]. http://www.shanghai.gov.cn/nw2/nw2314/nw2315/nw17239/nw17252/u21aw968232.html.2015-1-8.
    [4]
    广州市生态环境局. 2018年度广州PM2.5来源解析发布[EB/OL]. http://sthjj.gz.gov.cn/ysxw/content/post_5283732.

    html.2019-11-26.
    [5]
    深圳市人居环境委. 深圳官方公布PM2.5元凶[EB/OL]. http://gd.qq.com/a/20150428/010944.htm.2015-4-28.
    [6]
    济南市人民政府. 济南市2017年度环境空气PM10、PM2.5

    来源解析结果发布[EB/OL]. http://www.jinan.gov.cn/art/2018/5/18/art_28939_2636331.html.2018-5-18.
    [7]
    江苏省生态环境厅. 南京环保局发布PM2.5源解析工业污染是祸首[EB/OL]. http://hbt.jiangsu.gov.cn/art/2015/5/8/art_1565_4434877.html.2015-05-08.
    [8]
    杭州市生态环境局. 2014年杭州市环境状况公报[EB/OL]. http://epb.hangzhou.gov.cn/art/2015/6/5

    /art_1692349_38353527.html.2015-06-05.
    [9]
    武汉市环保局. 武汉雾霾成因报告出炉[EB/OL]. http://www.hubei.gov.cn/gzhd/gzhd/hygq_49009/.2016-4-22.
    [10]
    胡月琪,李萌,颜旭,等. 北京市典型道路扬尘化学组分特征及年际变化[J]. 环境科学,2019,40(4):1646-1655.
    [11]
    马召辉,梁云平,张健,等. 北京市典型排放源PM2.5成分谱研究[J]. 环境科学学报,2015,35(12):4043-4052.
    [12]
    陈筱佳,程金平,江璇,等. 上海市中心城区主干道道路扬尘组分特征及来源解析[J]. 环境污染与防治,2015,37(6):10-13.
    [13]
    余南娇,黄渤,李梅,等. 大气细颗粒物扬尘源单颗粒质谱特征[J]. 中国环境科学,2017,37(4):1262-1268.
    [14]
    吴虹,毕晓辉,冯银厂,等. 天津市大气颗粒物源成分谱特征研究[C]//中国环境科学学会学术年会论文集,2013,4812-4818.
    [15]
    XUE H Q, LIU G J, ZHANG H, et al. Similarities and differences in PM10 and PM2.5 concentrations, chemical compositions and sources in Hefei City, China[J]. Chemosphere, 2019, 220(4):760-765.
    [16]
    YU H, ZHAO X Y, WANG J, et al. Chemical characteristics of road dust PM2.5 fraction in oasis cities at the margin of Tarim Basin[J]. Journal of Environmental Sciences, 2020, 95:217-224.
    [17]
    CHIANESE E, TIRIMBERIO G, RICCIO A. PM2.5 and PM10 in the urban area of Naples:chemical composition, chemical properties and influence of air masses origin[J]. Journal of Atmospheric Chemistry, 2019, 76:151-169.
    [18]
    刘琼玉,姜郡亭,余新明,等. 一种颗粒物再悬浮采样装置:CN203658113U[P]. 2014-6-18.
    [19]
    黄睿,谈静,刘琼玉. PM2.5中有机碳/元素碳测定探讨[J]. 江汉大学学报(自然科学版),2016,44(1):11-17.
    [20]
    ANDREWS E, SAXENA P, MUSARRA S, et al. Concentration and composition of atmospheric aerosols from the 1995 SEVAS experimentand a review of the closure between chemical and gravimetric measurements[J]. Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association, 2000, 50:648-664.
    [21]
    陈涛. 成都市中心城区细粒子来源解析研究[D]. 成都:西南交通大学,2009.
    [22]
    王珍,郭军,陈卓. 贵阳市PM2.5主要污染源源成分谱分析[J]. 安全与环境学报,2016,16(2):346-351.
    [23]
    宋韶华,陈筱佳,文建辉,等. 桂林市开放扬尘源源谱构建及化学组成特征研究[J]. 工业安全与环保,2017,43(10):81-83

    ,92.
    [24]
    温新欣. 济南市环境空气细颗粒物污染特征研究[D]. 济南:山东大学,2009.
    [25]
    KONG S F, JI Y Q, LU B, et al. Characterization of PM10 source profiles for fugitive dust in Fushun:a city famous for coal[J]. Atmospheric Environment, 2011, 45:5351-5365.
    [26]
    HO K F, LEE S C, CHOW J C, et al. Characterization of PM10 and PM2.5 source profiles for fugitive dust in Hong Kong[J]. Atmospheric Environment, 2003, 37(8):1023-1032.
    [27]
    CHOW J C, WATSON J G, KUHNS H, et al. Source profiles for industrial, mobile, and area sources in the Big Bend regional aerosol visibility and observational study[J]. Chemosphere, 2004, 54(2):185-208.
    [28]
    叶荣民,王洪涛,董敏丽,等. 舟山市大气细颗粒物组分特征及其污染来源解析[J]. 环境工程,2019,37(5):122-128.
    [29]
    SUTHERLAND R A. Bed sediment-associated trace metals in an urban stream, Oahu, Hawai[J]. Environmental Geology, 2000, 39(6):611-627.
    [30]
    FAN J, SHANG Y N, ZHANG X J, et al. Joint pollution and source apportionment of PM2.5 among three different urban environments in Sichuan Basin, China[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2020, 714:1-9.
    [31]
    KATARZYNA J R, MAGDALENA R, KATARZYNA M, et al. Characterization of atmospheric PM2.5 sources at a central European urban background site[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2020, 713:1-15.
    [32]
    黎彤. 化学元素的地球丰度[J]. 地球化学,1976(3):167-174.
    [33]
    魏复盛,陈静生,吴燕玉,等. 中国土壤环境背景值研究[J]. 环境科学,1991,12(4):12-20.
    [34]
    FERGUSSON J E, KIM N D. Trace elements in street and house dusts:sources and speciation[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 1991, 100:125-150.
    [35]
    叶巡,程晋俊,陈莎,等. 秸秆燃烧PM2.5及其碳组分排放特征研究[J]. 农业环境科学学报,2019,38(5):1165-1175.
    [36]
    JOSEPH A E, UNNIKRISHNAN S, KUMAR R. Chemical characterization and mass closure of fine aerosol for different land use patterns in Mumbai city[J]. Aerosol & Air Quality Research, 2012, 12(1):61-72.
    [37]
    WONGPHATARAKUL V, FRIEDLANDER S K, PINTO J P. A comparative study of PM2.5 ambient aerosol chemical databases[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 1998, 32(24):3926-3934.
    [38]
    张伟,姬亚芹,张军,等. 辽宁省典型城市道路尘PM2.5成分谱研究[J]. 中国环境科学,2018,38(2):412-417.
    [39]
    戴树桂,朱坦,傅学起,等. 天津市大气颗粒物主要排放源的成分谱研究,城市生态系统与污染综合防治[M]. 北京:中国环境科学出版社,1988:425-436.
    [40]
    胡月琪,郭建辉,张超,等. 北京市道路扬尘重金属污染特征及潜在生态风险[J]. 环境科学,2019,40(9):3924-3934.
    [41]
    蒋耀东,张雪,张雷,等. 南京市、苏州市及南通市城区道路扬尘排放特性研究[J]. 环境科学与管理, 2017,42(2):47-51.
    [42]
    SUN J, SHEN Z X, ZHANG L M, et al. Chemical source profiles of urban fugitive dust PM2.5 samples from 21 cities across China[J]. The ence of the Total Environment, 2019, 649:1045-1053.
    • Relative Articles

  • Relative Articles

    [1]XU Yuanqian, FU Guangyu, SHENG Haozhe, YUE Libo, SUN Peng, LUO Yilin, CAO Jiahui, CAO Xia, CHEN Yang. PM2.5 POLLUTION CHARACTERISTICS AND SOURCE APPORTIONMENT IN A TYPICAL INDUSTRIAL CITY OF HENAN PROVINCE DURING AUTUMN AND WINTER[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2024, 42(12): 136-144. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202412017
    [2]YANG Zhixuan, LI Lanqing, LIU Huanjia, YANG Ying, XU Mengyuan, JIA Mengke, LIU Hengzhi. SEASONAL VARIATION, SOURCE AND LIGHT EXTINCTION CONTRIBUTION OF WATER-SOLUBLE INORGANIC IONS OF PM2.5 IN THE NORTHERN SUBURB OF ANYANG, CHINA[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2024, 42(6): 71-81. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202406009
    [3]WEI Xiangnan, MA Yunfeng, BAO Huiyu, ZHAO Huijie, SUN Xuebin, WANG Shuai, HOU Le. CHARACTERISTICS ANALYSIS OF PM2.5 AND O3 POLLUTION IN SHENYANG CITY[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2024, 42(10): 73-82. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202410010
    [4]CHEN Fang, HU Jun, XU Lizhong, HUANG Weilong, GUO Eryang, RAO Qinghua. SPATIOTEMPORAL AGGREGATION CHANGE PATTERN OF PM2.5 AND O3 CONCENTRATION IN FUJIAN PROVINCE,CHINA[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2024, 42(7): 171-182. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202407019
    [5]WU Yihao, CUI Yaojia, ZANG Xinzhi, WANG Wenqiang, YE Zhaolian. OXIDATIVE POTENTIAL AND SOURCE APPORTIONMENT OF PM2.5 DURING SPRING IN CHANGZHOU[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2024, 42(5): 53-61. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202405007
    [6]GUO Qianjin. COMPONENTS CHARACTERISTICS AND SOURCE APPORTIONMENT OF PM2.5 IN AUTUMN AND WINTER IN JINCHENG[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2024, 42(7): 153-161. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202407017
    [7]ZHANG Yibing, LIANG Yiqun, ZHANG Yuan, FANG Yinxiang, NIU Hongya, FAN Jingsen. SOURCE APPORTIONMENT AND ECOLOGICAL RISK ASSESSMENT OF HEAVY METALS IN PM2.5 IN THE FENGFENG MINING AREA IN 2017—2019[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2023, 41(8): 242-250. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202308031
    [8]ZHOU Jianguo, WANG Jianyu, WEI Siti. PREDICTION OF PM2.5 AND OZONE CONCENTRATION BASED ON VMD-CEEMD DECOMPOSITION AND LSTM[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2023, 41(6): 157-165,221. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202306021
    [9]LI Hongliang, TAO Jie, LI Lanqing, ZHAO Wenpeng, XU Mengyuan, JIA Mengke, YANG Ying, LIU Huanjia. POLLUTION CHARACTERISTICS AND SOURCE APPORTIONMENT OF WATER-SOLUBLE IONS IN PM2.5 IN XINXIANG[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2023, 41(8): 117-126. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202308015
    [10]LI Yang, LIU Yong-he, WANG Xi-yue, WANG Hai-lin. SPATIAL-TEMPORAL CHARACTERISTICS OF PM2.5 AND PM10 AND THEIR RELATIONSHIPS WITH METEOROLOGICAL FACTORS IN JIAOZUO, HENAN[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(9): 44-53. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202209006
    [11]SHEN Song, LIU Lei, WEN Wei, XING Yi, SU Wei, SUN Jiaqi. POLLUTION CHARACTERIZATION AND SOURCE ANALYSIS OF CARBON COMPONENTS OF PM2.5 IN BEIJING AND SURROUNDING AREAS IN SUMMER[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(2): 71-80. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202202012
    [12]ZHAO Hui-jie, MA Yun-feng, WANG Shuai, LIU Qi-yao, WEI Xiang-nan. CAUSE ANALYSIS OF A HEAVY PM2.5 POLLUTION PROCESS OCCURED IN SHENYANG[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(9): 33-43. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202209005
    [13]GUO Erbao, ZHANG Yifei, HU Haowei, WANG Hanxiao, LIU Xingcheng. PM2.5 PURIFICATION CHARACTERISTICS OF DIFFERENT FILTER UNITS IN INDOOR ENVIRONMENT OF THE BUIDINGS[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(4): 64-70. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202204010
    [14]WANG Cheng, CAO Jing-yuan, DUAN Xiao-lin, CHEN Hao, YAN Yu-long, PENG Lin. CHARACTERISTICS AND SOURCES ANALYSIS OF CARBONACEOUS COMPONENTS IN PM2.5 IN WINTER IN FOUR CITIES OF SHANXI PROVINCE[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2021, 39(6): 114-121. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202106017
    [15]HUANG Chun-tao, FAN Dong-ping, LU Ji-fu, LIAO Qi-feng. PREDICTION OF PM2.5 AND PM10 CONCENTRATION IN GUANGZHOU BASED ON DEEP LEARNING MODEL[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2021, 39(12): 135-140. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202112020
    [16]SU Ming-wei, ZHANG Wei-feng, ZHENG Run-he. DISTRIBUTION CHARACTERISTICS AND DIFFERENCE ANALYSIS OF PM2.5 BASED ON WAVELET ANALYSIS[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2021, 39(5): 96-103. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202105013
    [17]DING Shu-qin, WU Jia-ping, WAN Xue-ping, JIANG Lin, ZHAO Xue-ting, SHA Dan-dan. ANALYZE ON PM2.5 AND ITS MAIN CHEMICAL COMPOSITION DURING TYPICAL HEAVY AIR POLLUTION IN AUTUMN AND WINTER IN CHANGSHU[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2020, 38(3): 142-147,161. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202003024
    [18]WEI Wen-jing, XIE Bing-geng, ZHOU Kai-chun, LI Xiao-qing. RESEARCH ON TEMPORAL AND SPATIAL VARIATIONS OF ATMOSPHERIC PM2.5 AND PM10 AND THE INFLUENCING FACTORS IN SHANDONG, CHINA DURING 2013—2018[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2020, 38(12): 103-111. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202012018
    [19]ZHANG Zhong-di, SHAO Tian-jie, HUANG Xiao-gang, WEI Pei-ru. CHARACTERISTICS AND POTENTIAL SOURCES OF PM2.5 POLLUTION IN BEIJING-TIANJIN-HEBEI REGION IN 2017[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2020, 38(2): 99-106,134. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202002014
    [20]ZHAO Bin, LIU Bin. APPLICATION OF STACKING IN GROUND-LEVEL PM2.5 CONCENTRATION ESTIMATING[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2020, 38(2): 153-159. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202002022
    • Supplements(0)
    • Cited By

  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(2)

    1. 黄冠聪，黄晓波，颜敏，吴水平，李香. 深圳市不同施工阶段建筑扬尘化学组成特征及健康风险评价. 环境科学学报. 2024(05): 351-360 .
    2. 王静，赵雪艳，殷宝辉，马银红，王健，梁汉东，杨文. 城市间PM_(2.5)源的碳成分谱比较. 中国环境科学. 2022(12): 5523-5532 .

    Other cited types(1)

  • Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Amount of accessChart context menuAbstract Views, HTML Views, PDF Downloads StatisticsAbstract ViewsHTML ViewsPDF Downloads2024-052024-062024-072024-082024-092024-102024-112024-122025-012025-022025-032025-0402.557.51012.5
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Class DistributionFULLTEXT: 5.1 %FULLTEXT: 5.1 %META: 92.0 %META: 92.0 %PDF: 2.8 %PDF: 2.8 %FULLTEXTMETAPDF
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Area Distribution其他: 11.4 %其他: 11.4 %[]: 0.6 %[]: 0.6 %上海: 2.3 %上海: 2.3 %临汾: 0.6 %临汾: 0.6 %北京: 3.4 %北京: 3.4 %南通: 0.6 %南通: 0.6 %台州: 2.3 %台州: 2.3 %嘉兴: 1.1 %嘉兴: 1.1 %天津: 2.3 %天津: 2.3 %常德: 0.6 %常德: 0.6 %昆明: 2.8 %昆明: 2.8 %晋城: 1.1 %晋城: 1.1 %朝阳: 0.6 %朝阳: 0.6 %杭州: 0.6 %杭州: 0.6 %武汉: 2.8 %武汉: 2.8 %济源: 1.1 %济源: 1.1 %湖州: 2.3 %湖州: 2.3 %滁州: 0.6 %滁州: 0.6 %漯河: 2.8 %漯河: 2.8 %芒廷维尤: 27.3 %芒廷维尤: 27.3 %芝加哥: 1.7 %芝加哥: 1.7 %苏州: 0.6 %苏州: 0.6 %衢州: 2.3 %衢州: 2.3 %西宁: 17.6 %西宁: 17.6 %西安: 1.1 %西安: 1.1 %贵阳: 0.6 %贵阳: 0.6 %运城: 5.7 %运城: 5.7 %遵义: 0.6 %遵义: 0.6 %邯郸: 0.6 %邯郸: 0.6 %郑州: 1.1 %郑州: 1.1 %重庆: 0.6 %重庆: 0.6 %长治: 0.6 %长治: 0.6 %其他[]上海临汾北京南通台州嘉兴天津常德昆明晋城朝阳杭州武汉济源湖州滁州漯河芒廷维尤芝加哥苏州衢州西宁西安贵阳运城遵义邯郸郑州重庆长治

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索
    Get Citation
    PDF
    XML

    Article Metrics

    Article views (161) PDF downloads(5) Cited by(3)
    Proportional views
    Related

    Journal Online

    Authors' Center

    Links

    Copyright © 《工业建筑》杂志社有限公司 京ICP备11033253号-1

    Supported by: Beijing Renhe Information Technology Co. Ltd     百度统计

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return