Source Journal of CSCD
Source Journal for Chinese Scientific and Technical Papers
Core Journal of RCCSE
Included in JST China
Volume 39 Issue 6
Jan.  2022
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
LIU Yu-tong, ZHANG Yun, HOU Hao-chen, GAO Qiu-feng, XU Xiao-zhu. LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT OF HIGH PURITY MAGNESIUM PRODUCTION[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2021, 39(6): 187-191. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202106028
Citation: LIU Yu-tong, ZHANG Yun, HOU Hao-chen, GAO Qiu-feng, XU Xiao-zhu. LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT OF HIGH PURITY MAGNESIUM PRODUCTION[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2021, 39(6): 187-191. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202106028

LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT OF HIGH PURITY MAGNESIUM PRODUCTION

doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202106028
  • Received Date: 2020-09-04
    Available Online: 2022-01-18
  • High-purity magnesia was one of the most demanded and widely used products among many magnesia refractories. However, in recent years, high-purity magnesia manufacturers have faced problems such as high energy consumption, high pollution emissions, and difficulties in pollution control. This study used life cycle assessment to analyze the environmental impact of high-purity magnesia production, from cradle to gate, divided the entire process into six stages, selected 12 key environmental impact types, and established the list of material input and emissions. This study was modeled and calculated based on eBalance software. The results showed that the total environmental impact of high-purity magnesia production was 4.23×10-12, of which GWP was the largest environmental impact contribution type in the production of high-purity magnesia. The light burning stage and heavy burning stage had the largest environmental impact contribution, followed by the fine grinding stage, mining stage, and ball pressing stage, while the environmental impact contribution of the transportation stage was small.
  • loading
  • [1]
    师晓帆.辽宁镁质耐火材料大气治理存在的问题及建议[J].资源节约与环保,2019(4):167.
    [2]
    陈庆明,魏同.中国镁质耐火原料的发展现状和展望[J].耐火材料,2013,47(3):210-214.
    [3]
    全跃.镁质材料生产与应用[M].北京:冶金工业出版社,2008:3-30.
    [4]
    姚华柏,薛文东,罗旭东.Al2O3对低碳镁碳材料抗渣侵性能的影响[J].非金属矿.2019,42(2):80-83.
    [5]
    王恩会,陈俊红,侯新梅.钢包工作衬用耐火材料的研究现状及最新进展[J].工程科学学报.2019(6

    ).
    [6]
    吴学英.镁砂行业污染治理对策探讨[J].环境保护科学,2007,33(5):11-12

    ,20.
    [7]
    许嘉龙.辽宁省镁质耐火材料的行业现状、存在问题及发展建议[J]耐火材料,2013,47(1):70-73.
    [8]
    LI S B,QIN Y W,JEYAMKONDAN S,et al.Life cycle assessment of the U.S.beef processing through integrated hybrid approach[J].Journal of Cleaner Production,2020,265:121813.
    [9]
    HE L Y,CHEN Y.Thou shalt drive electric and hybrid vehicles:scenario analysis on energy saving and emission mitigation for road transportation sector in China[J].Transport Policy,2013,25:30-40.
    [10]
    LI J H,ZHANG Y,SHAO S,et al.Comparative life cycle assessment of conventional and new fused magnesia production[J].Journal of Cleaner Production,2015,91:170-179.
    [11]
    AN J,XUE X X.Life-cycle carbon footprint analysis of magnesia products[J].Resources Conservation and Recycling,2016,119:4-11.
    [12]
    ISO.ISO 14040 Environment Management-Life Cycle Assessment-Requirements and Guidelines[S].Geneva,Switzerland,2006.
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Article Metrics

    Article views (195) PDF downloads(4) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return