EFFECTS OF THERMAL HYDROLYSATES FROM MUNICIPAL SOLID WASTE ON SOIL ENZYME ACTIVITY AND SPINACH GROWTH

WANG Zhenhua; WU Juan; SONG Jianguo; BAI Jie

doi:10.13205/j.hjgc.202203019

Volume 40 Issue 3

Mar. 2022

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Article Navigation > ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING > 2022 > 40(3): 126-131

WANG Zhenhua, WU Juan, SONG Jianguo, BAI Jie. EFFECTS OF THERMAL HYDROLYSATES FROM MUNICIPAL SOLID WASTE ON SOIL ENZYME ACTIVITY AND SPINACH GROWTH[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(3): 126-131. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202203019

Citation:

WANG Zhenhua, WU Juan, SONG Jianguo, BAI Jie. EFFECTS OF THERMAL HYDROLYSATES FROM MUNICIPAL SOLID WASTE ON SOIL ENZYME ACTIVITY AND SPINACH GROWTH[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(3): 126-131. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202203019

Citation:

PDF( 4753 KB)

EFFECTS OF THERMAL HYDROLYSATES FROM MUNICIPAL SOLID WASTE ON SOIL ENZYME ACTIVITY AND SPINACH GROWTH

doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202203019

WANG Zhenhua^1,2,
WU Juan³,
SONG Jianguo⁴,
BAI Jie^{1,5
,
,}

1. College of Environmental Science and Engineering, Ocean University of China, Qingdao 266100, China;
2. Environmental Sanitation Management Center of Yantai, Yantai 264000, China;
3. College of Resources and Environment, Qingdao Agricultural University, Qingdao 266109, China;
4. School of Environmental and Material Engineering, Yantai University, Yantai 264005, China;
5. The Key Laboratory of Marine Environmental Science and Ecology, Ministry Education, Ocean University of China, Qingdao 266100, China

Received Date: 2021-08-14
Available Online: 2022-07-07

Abstract

Abstract

In this paper, the changes of soil enzyme activity and spinach biomass and their effects on soil physical and chemical properties and crop growth during spinach planting were studied by pot comparative experiment with two types of nutrient soils(nutrient soil A of municipal solid waste after thermal hydrolysis + high temperature aerobic compost and nutrient soil B of municipal solid waste after thermal hydrolysis) produced by different pretreatment processes. The results showed that both nutrient soil A and nutrient soil B could effectively increase the activities of urease, catalase and sucrase in the soil during spinach planting and it had a tendency to increase with the increase of nutrient soil dosage; at the same stage of spinach growth, the soil enzyme activity of nutrient soil A was higher than that of treatment group B and control group, and the highest urease value was 9.10 mg/g, appearing in the treatment group with the ratio of soil to nutrient soil of 5:1 (30 d). The application of the two kinds of nutrient soil could inhibit the activity of neutral phosphatase to some extent. Both nutrient soil A and nutrient soil B could significantly improve the biomass of spinach, especially when nutrient soil A applied with the ratio of soil to nutrient soil of 5:1, and then the fresh weight of spinach in the control group was 64.19 g, 132.32% higher than that in the control group. The application of nutrient soil A and B could affect soil enzyme activity and increase spinach biomass, and the overall effect of nutrient soil A was more obvious. The results of this study can provide theoretical basis and technical reference for effective resource utilization of MSW.
- domestic garbage,
- pyrohydrolysis,
- nutrient soil,
- soil fertility,
- enzymatic activity,
- biomass

FullText(HTML)

References(25)

References

[1]	魏潇潇,王小铭,李蕾,等.1979-2016年中国城市生活垃圾产生和处理时空特征[J].中国环境科学, 2018, 38(10):3833-3843.
[2]	袁金鹏,王敬平,周少奇,等.不同调理剂对有机垃圾好氧堆肥效果的影响[J].环境工程, 2016, 34(11):85-89.
[3]	马强,孙英杰,王华伟,等.添加腐熟污泥对生活垃圾堆肥氮素转化与损失的影响[J].环境工程学报, 2017,11(7):4325-4330.
[4]	田阳,项娟,路垚,等.生活垃圾堆肥处理研究[J].中国资源综合利用, 2020, 38(11):56-60.
[5]	张玉冬,张红玉,顾军,等.翻堆频率对厨余垃圾堆肥过程中H₂S和NH₃排放的影响[J].环境工程, 2016, 34(4):127-131.
[6]	杜龙龙,李国学,袁京,等.不同添加剂对厨余垃圾堆肥NH₃和H₂S排放的影响[J].农业工程学报, 2015, 31(23):195-200.
[7]	李甲亮,杜文琪,张鑫,等.城市生活垃圾RD湿解产物营养土的资源化利用[J].土壤通报, 2014, 45(2):476-479.
[8]	杨兰芳,杨庆,李兆华,李海波.有机垃圾颗粒肥料对玉米生物量和氮、磷含量的影响[J].河南农业科学, 2010(3):44-47.
[9]	李海云,周焱,单永辉,等.生活垃圾在不同湿解条件下蛋白质含量的动态分析研究[J].环境科学与管理, 2015, 40(6):67-69.
[10]	胡诚,刘东海,乔艳,等.施用生物有机肥对土壤酶活性及作物产量的影响[J].华北农学报, 2017, 32(S1):308-312.
[11]	张奇,张振华,卢信.生物有机肥施用对黄泛冲积区贫瘠土壤养分、酶和微生物多样性的影响[J].江苏农业学报, 2020, 36(2):325-335.
[12]	梁路,马臣,张然,等.有机无机肥配施提高旱地麦田土壤养分有效性及酶活性[J].植物营养与肥料学报, 2019, 25(4):544-554.
[13]	曲成闯,陈效民,韩召强,等.施用生物有机肥对黄瓜不同生育期土壤肥力特征及酶活性的影响[J].水土保持学报, 2017, 31(6):279-284.
[14]	李玥,韩萌,杨劲峰,等.炭基肥配施有机肥对风沙土养分含量及酶活性的影响[J].花生学报, 2020, 49(2):1-7.
[15]	宋以玲,于建,陈士更,等.化肥减量配施生物有机肥对油菜生长及土壤微生物和酶活性影响[J].水土保持学报, 2018, 32(1):352-360.
[16]	CHAMPION E, ANDRÉ I, MOULIS C, et al. Design of alpha-transglucosidases of controlled specificity for programmed chemoenzymatic synthesis of antigenic oligosaccharides[J]. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 2009, 131(21):7379-7389.
[17]	陈建伟,贾亮亮,赵京奇,等.喷施沼液对苹果产量品质及蔗糖代谢相关酶活性的影响[J].北方园艺, 2017(18):35-41.
[18]	郑钰铟,胡素萍,陈辉,等.油茶饼粕生物炭和有机肥对土壤酶活性的影响[J].森林与环境学报, 2018, 38(3):348-354.
[19]	郑凤君,王雪,李景,等.免耕条件下施用有机肥对冬小麦土壤酶及活性有机碳的影响[J].中国农业科学, 2020, 53(6):1202-1213.
[20]	李琦,裴怀弟,马忠明,等.钾肥与有机肥配施对食用百合根际土壤酶活性、养分含量及鳞茎产量的影响[J].中国土壤与肥料, 2020(1):91-99.
[21]	曲成闯,陈效民,张志龙,等.施用生物有机肥对黄瓜连作土壤有机碳库和酶活性的持续影响[J].应用生态学报, 2019, 30(9):3147-3154.
[22]	樊俊,谭军,王瑞,等.秸秆还田和腐熟有机肥对植烟土壤养分、酶活性及微生物多样性的影响[J].烟草科技, 2019, 52(2):12-18 ,61.
[23]	蒲全明,杨鹏,邓榆川,等.不同施肥方式对冬春茬甘蓝根际土壤酶活性、土壤养分及品质的影响[J].中国农业科技导报, 2020, 22(7):130-139.
[24]	陈影,陈苏,冯天朕,等.辽河干流河岸带土壤酶活性特征及相关性研究[J].环境科学与技术, 2020, 43(7):1-7.
[25]	王振龙,包蕾,葛新伟,等.有机滴灌肥对酿酒葡萄园土壤微生物量碳、氮及酶活性的影响[J].中国土壤与肥料, 2019(2):61-67.