Source Jouranl of CSCD
Source Journal of Chinese Scientific and Technical Papers
Included as T2 Level in the High-Quality Science and Technology Journals in the Field of Environmental Science
Core Journal of RCCSE
Included in the CAS Content Collection
Included in the JST China
Indexed in World Journal Clout Index (WJCI) Report
Volume 40 Issue 11
Nov.  2022
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
Abstract
References
Article Navigation >  ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING  > 2022  >  40(11): 189-198
LI Anna, WANG Hui, LIU Qiangnan, LI Taiping. DISTRIBUTION CHARACTERISTICS AND RISK ASSESSMENT OF SOIL POLLUTANTS IN AN EXPLOSION SITE OF A CHEMICAL PLANT[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(11): 189-198. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202211027
Citation: LI Anna, WANG Hui, LIU Qiangnan, LI Taiping. DISTRIBUTION CHARACTERISTICS AND RISK ASSESSMENT OF SOIL POLLUTANTS IN AN EXPLOSION SITE OF A CHEMICAL PLANT[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(11): 189-198. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202211027
shu

DISTRIBUTION CHARACTERISTICS AND RISK ASSESSMENT OF SOIL POLLUTANTS IN AN EXPLOSION SITE OF A CHEMICAL PLANT

doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202211027

  • 1. Department of Environment Engineering, School of Chemical Engineering & Pharmacy, Henan University of Science and Technology, Luoyang 471023, China;

  • 2. Beijing Construction Engineering Environmental Remediation Co., Ltd, Beijing 100045, China

  • Received Date: 2021-12-31
    Available Online: 2023-03-24
    Abstract
  • With an abandoned land area after an explosion accident in an organic chemical plant as the research subject, the soils at different depths were evaluated using the single-factor pollution index, and comprehensive pollution index, as well as the risk assessment model recommended in the Technical Guidelines for Soil Pollution Risk Assessment of Construction Land, HJ 25.3-2019. Further, we evaluated the pollution degree and health risk of the site, and proposed risk control values of pollutants based on human health risk assessment. The results showed that excessive pollutants in the soil comprised 1,1,2-trichloroethane, chlorobenzene and 1,4-dichlorobenzene, which were mainly concentrated in the central and northwest subsoil (2 to 8 meters deep) of the study area. The results of the single-factor pollution index assessment showed that these three organic compounds displayed different degrees of pollution in the subsoil, with chlorobenzene as the most serious pollutant. The results of the comprehensive pollution index assessment showed that the topsoil was not polluted, whereas the comprehensive pollution degree of some areas in the subsoil was severe. The health risk assessment results showed that the cancer risks and hazard quotient in the central and northwest subsoil of the study area exceeded the acceptable threshold. The primary exposure risk came from the indoor inhalation pathway of gaseous pollutants, such as chlorobenzene and 1,4-dichlorobene. The calculation results of the risk control value showed that the risk control value of pollutants was far lower than the maximum detection value. When the risk control value calculated by layers was selected as the repair target value, the amount of pollution could be effectively reduced.
    • FullText(HTML)
    • References(47)
  • [1]
    王瑞强,许永莉,杜军,等.基于盲数与成熟度理论的化工园区火灾爆炸事故应急能力评估[J].安全与环境工程, 2021, 28(2):30-35.
    [2]
    LU Y, WANG T, LIU T. Bayesian network-based risk analysis of chemical plant explosion accidents[J]. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 2020, 17(15):5364.
    [3]
    陈大鹏,陈力,还毅,等.盐城响水化工园区"3·21"危化品爆炸事故爆炸威力分析及灾害后果评估[J].防灾减灾工程学报, 2020,40(2):196-203.
    [4]
    PENG Y S, YANG R D, JIN T, et al. Risk assessment for potentially toxic metal(loid)s in potatoes in the indigenous zinc smelting area of northwestern Guizhou province, China[J]. Food and Chemical Toxicology, 2018, 120:328-339.
    [5]
    OYUNBAT P, BATKHISHIG O, BATSAIKHAN B, et al. Spatial distribution, pollution, and health risk assessment of heavy metal in industrial area soils of ulaanbaatar, mongolia[J]. The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, 2021, XLIII-B4-2021:123-133.
    [6]
    WANG H, ZHANG H, TANG H, et al. Heavy metal pollution characteristics and health risk evaluation of soil around a tungsten-molybdenum mine in Luoyang, China[J]. Environmental Earth Sciences, 2021, 80(7):1-12.
    [7]
    WU B, GUO S H. Spatial ecological risk assessment for contaminated soil in oiled fields[J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2021, 403:123984.
    [8]
    吴志远,张丽娜,夏天翔,等. 基于土壤重金属及PAHs来源的人体健康风险定量评价:以北京某工业污染场地为例[J].环境科学, 2020, 41(9):4180-4196.
    [9]
    JIA J, HE H, WANG Z, et al. Human health risk levels and distribution of PAHs in soil environment of a coking chemical plant located in Beijing, China[J]. Journal of Bioremediation & Biodegradation, 2017, 8(5):1-11.
    [10]
    FM A, FHMT B, AJB C, et al. The pesticide health risk index-An application to the world's countries[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2021, 801:149731.
    [11]
    王甫洋,田珺,夏晶,等.南京某化工企业搬迁场地土壤有机污染调查及健康风险评价研究[J].四川环境, 2020,(1):105-111.
    [12]
    LEI R, SUN Y, ZHU S, et al. Investigation on distribution and risk assessment of volatile organic compounds in surface water, sediment, and soil in a chemical industrial park and adjacent area[J]. Molecules, 2021, 26(19):5988-5999.
    [13]
    SHUAI J, KIM S, RYU H, et al. Health risk assessment of volatile organic compounds exposure near Daegu dyeing industrial complex in South Korea[J]. Bmc Public Health, 2018, 18(1):528.
    [14]
    RAMÍREZ N, CUADRAS A, ROVIRA E, et al. Chronic risk assessment of exposure to volatile organic compounds in the atmosphere near the largest Mediterranean industrial site[J]. Environment International, 2012, 39(1):200-209.
    [15]
    HAN L, QIAN L B, YAN J C, et al. A comparison of risk modeling tools and a case study for human health risk assessment of volatile organic compounds in contaminated groundwater[J]. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2016, 23(2):1234-1245.
    [16]
    HU G, LIU H, CHEN C, et al. An integrated geospatial correlation analysis and human health risk assessment approach for investigating abandoned industrial sites-Science Direct[J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 2021, 293:112891.
    [17]
    韩煦,陈洁,孙守钧,等.染料厂遗留场地中氯仿和苯并(a)芘的污染特征与健康风险评价[J].环境工程, 2021, 39(8):211-216.
    [18]
    葛锋,张转霞,扶恒,等.我国有机污染场地现状分析及展望[J].土壤,2021,53(6):1132-1141.
    [19]
    XI A, CXA B, YZ A, et al. A new perspective on volatile halogenated hydrocarbons in Chinese agricultural soils-Science Direct[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2019,703:134646.
    [20]
    中华人民共和国生态环境部.建设用地土壤污染风险评估技术导则(发布稿):HJ 25.3-2019[S]. 北京:中国环境科学出版社,2019.
    [21]
    翟皓宇,王少猛,谢传欣. 2,4-二硝基氯苯的合成工艺过程热风险性分析[J].青岛科技大学学报(自然科学版),2020,41(4

    ):52-56.
    [22]
    中华人民共和国生态环境部.土壤环境质量建设用地土壤污染风险管控标准(试行):GB 36600-2018[S].北京:中国环境科学出版社,2018.
    [23]
    中华人民共和国生态环境部.地下水质量标准:GB/T 14848-2017[S].北京:中国环境科学出版社,2017.
    [24]
    张浩,王辉,汤红妍,等.铅锌尾矿库土壤和蔬菜重金属污染特征及健康风险评价[J].环境科学学报,2020,40(3):1085-1094.
    [25]
    赵靓,梁云平,陈倩,等.中国北方某市城市绿地土壤重金属空间分布特征、污染评价及来源解析[J].环境科学,2020,41(12):5552-5561.
    [26]
    LIU Q Y, WU Y H, ZHOU Y Z, et al. A novel method to analyze the spatial distribution and potential sources of pollutant combinations in the soil of Beijing urban parks[J]. Environmental Pollution, 2021, 284:117191.
    [27]
    韩琳,徐夕博.基于PMF模型及地统计的土壤重金属健康风险定量评价[J].环境科学,2020,41(11):5114-5124.
    [28]
    NASCIMENTO C, SILVA F, NETA A, et al. Geopedology-climate interactions govern the spatial distribution of selenium in soils:a case study in northeastern Brazil[J]. Geoderma, 2021, 399(13):115119.
    [29]
    邓劲蕾,张晟,唐敏,等.铅在搬迁企业原址场地土壤中的空间分布及生态风险[J].环境化学,2011,30(2):435-439.
    [30]
    刘芬芬,孙小华,丁力,等. 搬迁企业原址场地土壤挥发性有机物污染特征:以北京某搬迁化工厂为例[J].城市地质,2021,16(1):18-24.
    [31]
    YOON M, MADDEN M C, BARTON H A. Extrahepatic metabolism by CYP2E1 in PBPK modeling of lipophilic volatile organic chemicals:impacts on metabolic parameter estimation and prediction of dose metrics[J]. Journal of Toxicology & Environmental Health Part A, 2007, 70(18):1527-1541.
    [32]
    ZHANG Y, QU C, QI S, et al. Spatial-temporal variations and transport process of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in Poyang Lake:implication for dry-wet cycle impacts[J]. Journal of Geochemical Exploration, 2021, 226(3):106738.
    [33]
    陈静,王学军,陶澍,等.天津地区土壤多环芳烃在剖面中的纵向分布特征[J].环境科学学报,2004, 24(2):286-290.
    [34]
    ZHAO W C, YANG X, FENG A X, et al. Distribution and migration characteristics of dinitrotoluene sulfonates (DNTs) in typical TNT production sites:effects and health risk assessment[J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 2021, 287:112342.
    [35]
    武晓峰,谢磊,赵洪阳.土壤及地下水污染点不同暴露途径的健康风险比较[J].中国环境科学,2012,32(2):345-350.
    [36]
    SUN Y M, WANG J C, GUO G L, et al. A comprehensive comparison and analysis of soil screening values derived and used in China and the UK[J]. Environmental Pollution, 2020, 256:113404.
    [37]
    UNNITHAN A, BEKELE D, CHADALAVADA S, et al. Insights into vapour intrusion phenomena:current outlook and preferential pathway scenario[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2021, 796:148885.
    [38]
    董敏刚,张建荣,罗飞,等.我国南方某典型有机化工污染场地土壤与地下水健康风险评估[J].土壤,2015,47(1):100-106.
    [39]
    房吉敦,杜晓明,李政,等.某复合型化工污染场地分地层健康风险评估[J].环境工程技术学报,2013,3(5):451-457.
    [40]
    陈莉娜,张帅,许石豪,等.典型有机化工遗留场地的健康风险评估[J].广东化工,2017,44(9):192-195.
    [41]
    罗飞,宋静,潘云雨,等.典型滴滴涕废弃生产场地污染土壤的人体健康风险评估研究[J]. 土壤学报, 2012, 49(1):26-35.
    [42]
    王璇,于宏旭,熊惠磊,等.南方某典型矿冶污染场地健康风险评价及修复建议[J].环境工程学报,2017,11(6):3823-3831.
    [43]
    许伟,施维林,沈桢,等.工业遗留场地复合型污染分层健康风险评估研究[J].土壤,2016,48(2):322-330.
    [44]
    王佳,李余杰,陈晶,等.层次化健康风险评估方法在重金属污染场地的应用[J].重庆工商大学学报(自然科学版),2018,35(2):87-93.
    [45]
    史俊祥,郑娟,杨洋,等.基于HERA土壤分层风险评估的SVE修复方案优化[J].环境工程学报,2019,13(12):2954-2962.
    [46]
    刘丽丽,邓一荣,林挺,等.粤港澳大湾区典型化工地块地下水分层调查与风险评估[J].环境污染与防治,2021,43(1):67-72.
    [47]
    GENG C, LUO Q, CHEN M, et al. Quantitative risk assessment of trichloroethylene for a former chemical works in Shanghai, China[J]. Human and Ecological Risk Assessment:An International Journal, 2010, 2:429-443.
    • Relative Articles

  • Relative Articles

    [1]QIAN Jiangbo, CHEN Di, WANG Xiahui, LI Xilin, HUANG Guoxin. RISK DIAGNOSIS OF HEAVY METAL POLLUTION IN REGIONAL SOIL BASED ON MACHINE LEARNING[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2023, 41(12): 296-303. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202312037
    [2]TENG Keyan, SUN Hongtu, ZENG Yufeng, ZHENG Guofeng. DERIVATION OF RISK SCREENING VALUES FOR RADIOACTIVE CONTAMINATION OF SOIL IN NUCLEAR FACILITY DECOMMISSIONING[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2023, 41(7): 235-240. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202307032
    [3]WANG Chengwen, ZHANG Yong, ZHANG Jiaxin, ZHANG Hui. SPATIAL DISTRIBUTION OF SEDIMENT NUTRIENTS IN A WETLAND WITH RECLAIMED WATER SUPPLEMENT[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2023, 41(1): 87-92,104. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202301011
    [4]CHE Kai, HAN Zhongge, YU Jinxing, CHEN Chongming, LIU Songtao, GU Xingjia. EXPERIMENTAL STUDY ON MICROWAVE DESORPTION OF SOIL CONTAMINATED BY INSULATING OIL[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(2): 127-131,138. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202202020
    [5]NI Haifeng, DAN Zeng, ZHOU Wenwu, ZHOU Peng, XU Fei, YANG Tao, MENG Dean, CHEN Guanyi. CHARACTERISTICS ANALYSIS AND RISK ASSESSMENT OF HEAVY METALS OF WASTE INCINERATION FLY ASH IN LHASA[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(3): 89-93,131. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202203014
    [6]HUANG Guoxin, LIU Ruiping, YANG Ruijie, ZHANG Tao, ZHANG Qiulei, WANG Xiahui, TIAN Zi, WANG Yipeng. RESEARCH PROCESS OF RISK MANAGEMENT AND CONTROL AND THEIR APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS FOR FARMLAND SOIL HEAVY METAL CONTAMINATION IN CHINA[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(1): 216-223. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202201031
    [7]CHEN Rui, DU Shuangjie, XU Wei, ZHU Tao. CONCENTRATION CHARACTERISTICS AND POLLUTION ASSESSMENT OF HEAVY METALS IN SOIL OF A WITHDRAWAL CULTIVATED LAND IN SUBURB OF NANJING[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(3): 102-110,165. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202203016
    [8]CHE Kai, YU Jinxing, LIU Kecheng, YANG Peng, FAN Hui, WEI Minglei, NIU Xiangnan, HOU Haiping. COMPARATIVE STUDY OF DIFFERENT TOXICITY EVALUATION MODELS ON HEALTH RISK ASSESSMENT OF PAHS IN SOIL OF TYPICAL SUBSTATION SITES[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(1): 128-134. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202201019
    [9]MIAO Fangfang, ZHANG Yimei, LI Yu, LIN Qianguo. ANALYSIS OF SOIL POLLUTION AND HEALTH RISK ASSESSMENT OF CHEMICAL[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(7): 94-100. doi: DOI:10.13205/j.hjgc.202207014
    [10]NIU Zhenru, LI Feifei, ZHANG Youjun, QU Weigui, CONG Hui, LIU Shigang, ZHANG Jia. SPATIAL DISTRIBUTION AND CAUSES OF CHLORINATED HYDROCARBONS POLLUTION IN SOIL IN A TYPICAL CONTAMINATED SITE[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(3): 94-101,228. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202203015
    [11]LI Huaxiang, ZHAO Xiujun, LIU Yinghua, LUO Zhiji. SPATIAL DISTRIBUTION AND RISK ASSESSMENT OF TUNGSTEN POLLUTION OF SOIL IN A SMELTING SITE[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(1): 141-147. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202201021
    [12]JIN Xiao-dan, TIAN Yong-qiang, WU Hao, CHEN He-xiao, WANG Xing-run, CHENG Jin-ping. CHARACTERISTICS OF CHROMIUM POLLUTION AND ITS INFLUENCING FACTORS IN LEATHER INDUSTRY[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2021, 39(12): 206-211,219. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202112031
    [13]PEI Hao-peng, XU Yan, CHEN Rui, TU Qi, LI Hou-yu, SHI Rong-guang. DISTRIBUTION CHARACTERISTICS AND INFLUENCING FACTORS OF ANTIBIOTICS IN SOILS OF DIFFERENT LAND USE TYPES IN SUBURBS OF TIANJIN[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2021, 39(1): 166-173. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202101026
    [14]HAN Xu, CHEN Jie, SUN Shou-jun, XU Xiao-lu, SHI Wei-lin. POLLUTION ANALYSIS AND SPATIAL DISTRIBUTION OF HEALTH RISK IN THE RESIDUAL SITE OF DYE FACTORY[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2021, 39(8): 211-216. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202108029
    [15]WAN Ling, XIANG Song, NIU Yong, HUANG Tian-yin, WANG Yong-tao, PANG Yan. DISTRIBUTION CHARACTERISTICS AND POLLUTION ASSESSMENT OF NITROGEN, PHOSPHORUS AND ORGANIC MATTERS IN SURFACE SEDIMENTS OF THE NIUGU RIVER[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2021, 39(1): 174-180. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202101027
    [16]PENG Jin-jin, LI Lin, ZHENG Chuan, HU Ling, WU Xiao-xu. ANALYSIS OF DISTRIBUTION CHARACTERISTICS OF BTEX IN A DYESTUFF CHEMICAL SITE[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2021, 39(4): 187-194. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202104028
    [17]ZHENG Ying-yi, LIU Jie, JIANG Ping-ping, YOU Shao-hong, ZHOU Shu-lin, YU Guo. POLLUTION ASSESSMENT OF HEAVY METALS IN FARMLAND SOILS AROUND AN ABANDONED SMELTER IN HECHI, CHINA[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2021, 39(5): 238-245. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202105033
    [18]WANG Qing-feng, FAN Lei-lei, WANG Dan, PENG Hui-hui, LI Zhong-gen. ECOLOGICAL RISK OF MERCURY IN SURFACE SEDIMENTS OF TYPICAL URBAN STREAM IN GUIZHOU PROVINCE[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2020, 38(8): 249-254. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202008041
    [19]Liu Xiao'er. POLLUTION AND ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY EVALUATION FOR SOIL IN THE OIL PRODUCTION ZONES OF AN OIL FIELD[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2015, 33(2): 126-129. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.201502028
    [20]Fan Shuanxi. POLLUTION AND HEALTH RISK ASSESSMENT OF HEAVY METALS IN SOIL AROUND A SMELTER IN CHANGQING TOWN OF BAOJI CITY[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2015, 33(4): 121-127. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.201504026
    • Supplements(0)
    • Cited By

  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(4)

    1. 周礼洋. 典型有机化工厂污染地块氯代烃分布特征及基于蒙特卡洛模拟的风险评估. 环境工程技术学报. 2024(01): 98-111 .
    2. 罗华. 基于生态安全格局的含能材料污染场地土壤可持续修复研究. 环境科学与管理. 2024(09): 184-188 .
    3. 靳佳乐，徐宏玺. 造纸厂土壤中邻苯二甲酸二异丁酯的污染特征及风险评估方法研究. 造纸科学与技术. 2023(06): 77-82 .
    4. 高洪娥，刘树宝，敖淑楠，刘潇，李玉红，杨军霞，杨彦武. 土壤污染成因及防治策略研究. 农业工程与装备. 2023(04): 11-13 .

    Other cited types(1)

  • Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Amount of accessChart context menuAbstract Views, HTML Views, PDF Downloads StatisticsAbstract ViewsHTML ViewsPDF Downloads2024-052024-062024-072024-082024-092024-102024-112024-122025-012025-022025-032025-040510152025
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Class DistributionFULLTEXT: 10.5 %FULLTEXT: 10.5 %META: 86.6 %META: 86.6 %PDF: 2.9 %PDF: 2.9 %FULLTEXTMETAPDF
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Area Distribution其他: 15.5 %其他: 15.5 %上海: 4.2 %上海: 4.2 %东莞: 0.8 %东莞: 0.8 %临汾: 0.4 %临汾: 0.4 %北京: 2.5 %北京: 2.5 %南京: 2.9 %南京: 2.9 %南宁: 0.4 %南宁: 0.4 %南昌: 1.7 %南昌: 1.7 %台州: 2.1 %台州: 2.1 %哈尔滨: 0.4 %哈尔滨: 0.4 %嘉兴: 0.4 %嘉兴: 0.4 %天津: 0.8 %天津: 0.8 %威海: 0.4 %威海: 0.4 %常德: 0.8 %常德: 0.8 %广州: 1.7 %广州: 1.7 %廊坊: 0.4 %廊坊: 0.4 %张家口: 5.0 %张家口: 5.0 %成都: 1.3 %成都: 1.3 %扬州: 0.4 %扬州: 0.4 %拉斯顿: 1.3 %拉斯顿: 1.3 %昆明: 1.7 %昆明: 1.7 %晋城: 0.8 %晋城: 0.8 %朝阳: 0.4 %朝阳: 0.4 %杭州: 3.4 %杭州: 3.4 %武汉: 1.3 %武汉: 1.3 %沈阳: 1.3 %沈阳: 1.3 %泰安: 0.4 %泰安: 0.4 %泸州: 0.4 %泸州: 0.4 %洛杉矶: 0.4 %洛杉矶: 0.4 %济源: 0.8 %济源: 0.8 %温州: 0.4 %温州: 0.4 %湖州: 1.3 %湖州: 1.3 %漯河: 2.1 %漯河: 2.1 %盐城: 0.4 %盐城: 0.4 %福州: 0.4 %福州: 0.4 %芒廷维尤: 25.6 %芒廷维尤: 25.6 %芝加哥: 1.7 %芝加哥: 1.7 %衢州: 1.3 %衢州: 1.3 %西宁: 6.7 %西宁: 6.7 %西安: 0.4 %西安: 0.4 %贵阳: 0.4 %贵阳: 0.4 %运城: 2.9 %运城: 2.9 %遵义: 0.4 %遵义: 0.4 %郑州: 0.4 %郑州: 0.4 %重庆: 0.4 %重庆: 0.4 %长治: 0.4 %长治: 0.4 %其他上海东莞临汾北京南京南宁南昌台州哈尔滨嘉兴天津威海常德广州廊坊张家口成都扬州拉斯顿昆明晋城朝阳杭州武汉沈阳泰安泸州洛杉矶济源温州湖州漯河盐城福州芒廷维尤芝加哥衢州西宁西安贵阳运城遵义郑州重庆长治

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索
    Get Citation
    PDF
    XML

    Article Metrics

    Article views (205) PDF downloads(7) Cited by(5)
    Proportional views
    Related

    Journal Online

    Authors' Center

    Links

    Copyright © 《工业建筑》杂志社有限公司 京ICP备11033253号-1

    Supported by: Beijing Renhe Information Technology Co. Ltd     百度统计

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return