ANALYSIS OF ECOLOGICAL PROTECTION SITUATION AND ITS VARIATION CHARACTERISTICS OF THE CHISHUI RIVER BASIN

CHEN Yan; ZHAI Jun; YANG Min; ZHU Hanshou; JIN Diandian; GAO Haifeng; HOU Peng

doi:10.13205/j.hjgc.202304026

Volume 41 Issue 4

Apr. 2023

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Article Navigation > ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING > 2023 > 41(4): 185-194

CHEN Yan, ZHAI Jun, YANG Min, ZHU Hanshou, JIN Diandian, GAO Haifeng, HOU Peng. ANALYSIS OF ECOLOGICAL PROTECTION SITUATION AND ITS VARIATION CHARACTERISTICS OF THE CHISHUI RIVER BASIN[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2023, 41(4): 185-194. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202304026

Citation:

CHEN Yan, ZHAI Jun, YANG Min, ZHU Hanshou, JIN Diandian, GAO Haifeng, HOU Peng. ANALYSIS OF ECOLOGICAL PROTECTION SITUATION AND ITS VARIATION CHARACTERISTICS OF THE CHISHUI RIVER BASIN[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2023, 41(4): 185-194. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202304026

Citation:

CHEN Yan, ZHAI Jun, YANG Min, ZHU Hanshou, JIN Diandian, GAO Haifeng, HOU Peng. ANALYSIS OF ECOLOGICAL PROTECTION SITUATION AND ITS VARIATION CHARACTERISTICS OF THE CHISHUI RIVER BASIN[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2023, 41(4): 185-194. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202304026

PDF( 7864 KB)

ANALYSIS OF ECOLOGICAL PROTECTION SITUATION AND ITS VARIATION CHARACTERISTICS OF THE CHISHUI RIVER BASIN

doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202304026

Satellite Application Center for Ecology and Environment, Beijing 100094, China

Received Date: 2022-06-30
Available Online: 2023-05-26
Publish Date: 2023-04-01

Abstract

Abstract

From the perspective of comprehensive assessment of a regional ecosystem, this study carried out a quantitative assessment on the current situation and change characteristics of ecological pattern, quality and function of the Chishui River Basin from 2001 to 2020, and coupled social and economic indicators to identify the characteristics of ecological protection and spatial differentiation of the basin. The results showed that the upper, middle and lower sub-basins of the Chishui River Basin had obvious gradient change characteristics in each evaluation index. The ecological background of the lower reaches of the basin was the best, followed by the middle reaches and then the lower reaches. Specifically, the ecological pattern and functions in the lower reaches of the basin were relatively stable, and showed steady and positive changes. For example, the Datong River Sub-basin located in the lower reaches was dominated by forest ecosystems, with an ecological quality index of 74.22, which was the highest in the whole Chishui River Basin. From the perspective of the coordination between ecological protection and economic and social development, the downstream reflected Win-Win characteristics of ecological protection and people’s livelihood improvement; the ecological pattern and functional indicators in the middle and upper reaches of the basin were most disturbed, and some sub-basins were significantly worse. For example, the sub-basin from the Daoliu River Estuary to Xiaohedukou in the upper reaches is the most typical, with an average annual decrease in water conservation per unit area of 12100 m³/km²; the growth rate of per capita GDP in the upper reaches of the basin was the slowest, only 800 yuan/a, which was 1.9% of the growth rate of per capita GDP in the middle reaches. It was necessary to strengthen ecological protection and explore a new growth mode of economic and social development.
- ecological assessment,
- Chishui River Basin,
- ecological pattern,
- ecological quality,
- ecological function

FullText(HTML)

References(35)

References

[1]	ANA P P, CRISTIANA V, CLÁUDIA C S, et al. Regional planning of river protection and restoration to promote ecosystem services and nature conservation[J]. Landscape and Urban Planning, Volume, 2021,211:104101.
[2]	SHEREIF H, MAHMOUD, THIAN Y, et al. Impact of anthropogenic climate change and human activities on environment and ecosystem services in arid regions[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2018, 633: 1329-1344.
[3]	BENNETT E M, CRAMER W, BEGOSSI A et al. Linking biodiversity, ecosystem services, and human well-being: three challenges for designing research for sustainability[J]. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 2015, 14(6): 76-85.
[4]	YANG S, WANG H, TONG J, et al. Technical efficiency of China’s agriculture and output elasticity of factors based on water resources utilization[J]. Water 12, 2020: 1-23.
[5]	傅伯杰, 陈利顶, 马克明. 黄土丘陵区小流域土地利用变化对生态环境的影响:以延安市羊圈沟流域为例[J]. 地理学报, 1999,54(3): 241-246.
[6]	杨清可, 段学军, 王磊, 等. 长三角地区城市土地利用与生态环境效应的交互作用机制研究[J].地理科学进展, 2021, 40(2):220-231.
[7]	LUO R, YANG S L, WANG Z Y, et al. Impact and trade off analysis of land use change on spatial pattern of ecosystem services in Chishui River Basin[J]. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2021, 29(14): 20234-20248.
[8]	WANG S, HU M M, WANG Y F, et al. Dynamics of ecosystem services in response to urbanization across temporal and spatial scales in a mega metropolitan area[J]. Sustainable Cities and Society, 2022,77:103561.
[9]	JOSEPHINE O, KWAKU A A, SAMUEL N O, et al. Land use/land cover dynamics using landsat data in a gold mining basin-the Ankobra, Ghana[J]. Remote Sensing Applications: Society and Environment, 2019,13:247-256.
[10]	QI Y, LIAN X H, WANG H W, et al. Dynamic mechanism between human activities and ecosystem services: a case study of Qinghai lake watershed, China[J]. Ecological Indicators, 2020,117:106528.
[11]	郑丙辉, 张远, 李英博. 辽河流域河流栖息地评价指标与评价方法研究[J]. 环境科学学报, 2007,27(6): 928-936.
[12]	田智慧, 尹传鑫, 王晓蕾. 鄱阳湖流域生态环境动态评估及驱动因子分析[J]. 环境科学,2023,44(2): 816-827.
[13]	章程焱, 杨少康, 董晓华,等. 基于RSEI指数的长江上游流域生态环境质量时空演变及影响因子研究[J]. 水土保持研究,2023,30(1):356-363.
[14]	粟晓玲, 康绍忠, 佟玲. 内陆河流域生态系统服务价值的动态估算方法与应用:以甘肃河西走廊石羊河流域为例[J]. 生态学报, 2006,26(6): 2011-2019.
[15]	兰紫橙, 贾岚, 程煜. 闽江流域生态系统服务价值评估及权衡协同关系[J]. 生态学报, 2020, 40(12): 3909-3920.
[16]	白杨, 郑华, 庄长伟,等. 白洋淀流域生态系统服务评估及其调控[J]. 生态学报, 2013, 33(3): 711-717.
[17]	颜俨, 姚柳杨, 郎亮明,等. 基于Meta回归方法的中国内陆河流域生态系统服务价值再评估[J]. 地理学报, 2019, 74(5): 1040-1057.
[18]	LI R D, ZHENG H, POLASKY S, et al. Ecosystem restoration on Hainan Island: can we optimize for enhancing regulating services and poverty alleviation[J]. Environmental Research Letters, 2020, 15(8):1-10.
[19]	李开明, 钟义, 吴仁人,等. 持续推进赤水河流域绿色发展[N]. 中国环境报, 2020-11-2.
[20]	邱凉, 郑艳霞, 翟红娟,等. 赤水河流域生态补偿机制研究[J]. 人民长江, 2013, 44(13): 94-96 ,108.
[21]	沈永平. 全国1∶25万三级水系流域数据集. 国家冰川冻土沙漠科学数据中心(www.ncdc.ac.cn), 2019.
[22]	环境保护部, 中国科学院. 全国生态环境十年变化(2000—2010年)遥感调查评估[M]. 北京:科学出版社, 2014.
[23]	环境保护部, 中国科学院. 关于印发《全国生态功能区划(修编版)》的公告(2015年第61号). [EB/OL]https://www.mee.gov.cn/gkml/hbb/bgg/201511/t20151126_317777. htm.2015.11.23.
[24]	中国统计年鉴编委会. 中国统计年鉴[M]. 中国统计出版社, 2000-2020.
[25]	生态环境部.全国生态状况调查评估技术规范——生态系统质量评估: HJ 1172—2021[S]. 2021.
[26]	THEIL H. A rank-invariant method of linear and polynomial regression analysis[J]. Nederl.akad.wetensch.proc, 1992, 12(2): 345-381.
[27]	SEN, KUMAR P. Estimates of the regression coefficient based on kendall’s tau[J]. Publications of the American Statistical Association, 1968, 63(324): 1379-1389.
[28]	HISDALA H, STAHLC K, TALLAKSENA L M, et al. Have streamflow droughts in Europe become more severe or frequent[J]. International Journal of Climatology, 2001, 21(3): 317-333.
[29]	BURN D H, ELNUR M. Detection of hydrologic trends and variability[J]. Journal of Hydrology, 2002, 255(1/2/3/4): 107-122.
[30]	刘纪远, 张增祥, 徐新良,等. 21世纪初中国土地利用变化的空间格局与驱动力分析[J]. 地理学报, 2009,64(12):1411-1420.
[31]	刘纪远, 匡文慧, 张增祥,等. 20世纪80年代末以来中国土地利用变化的基本特征与空间格局[J]. 地理学报, 2014, 69(1): 3-14.
[32]	匡文慧, 张树文, 杜国明,等. 2015—2020年中国土地利用变化遥感制图及时空特征分析[J]. 地理学报, 2022, 77(5): 1056-1071.
[33]	生态环境部. 全国生态状况调查评估技术规范——生态系统质量评估:HJ 1172—2021[S]. 2021.
[34]	高吉喜,王永财,侯鹏,等. 近20年黄河流域陆表水域面积时空变化特征研究[J]. 水利学报, 2020, 51(9):1157-1164.
[35]	生态环境部. 全国生态状况调查评估技术规范——生态系统服务功能评估:HJ 1173—2021[S]. 2021.