Source Journal of CSCD
Source Journal for Chinese Scientific and Technical Papers
Core Journal of RCCSE
Included in JST China
Volume 41 Issue 4
Apr.  2023
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
ZHAO Bin, PENG Tianyue, ZHANG Hao, WANG Liuwei, ZONG Wenjing, HOU Deyi. CHARACTERISTICS IDENTIFICATION AND HEALTH RISK ASSESSMENT OF MERCURY CONTAMINATED SITES[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2023, 41(4): 205-212. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202304028
Citation: ZHAO Bin, PENG Tianyue, ZHANG Hao, WANG Liuwei, ZONG Wenjing, HOU Deyi. CHARACTERISTICS IDENTIFICATION AND HEALTH RISK ASSESSMENT OF MERCURY CONTAMINATED SITES[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2023, 41(4): 205-212. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202304028

CHARACTERISTICS IDENTIFICATION AND HEALTH RISK ASSESSMENT OF MERCURY CONTAMINATED SITES

doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202304028
  • Received Date: 2022-07-16
    Available Online: 2023-05-26
  • Publish Date: 2023-04-01
  • Characteristic identification and risk management of mercury-contaminated sites are an important implementation plan of the Minamata Convention on Mercury(the Convention). Focusing on the scientific problems regarding unclear characteristics of site-scale mercury pollution and inadequate risk management system, life-cycle Hg flow along with potential contamination pathways within different anthropogenic activities were studied systematically. Site characteristics, consisting of sources, emission, transport and transformation, were discussed on a typical Hg-contaminated site from Hg ore mining and smelting, where a conceptual site model was constructed and systematic management strategies were studied. Research results showed that mercury-contaminated sites were related to intentional discharge activities, including ore mining, mercury catalysts, Chlor-alkali, polyvinyl chloride, treatment of Hg-containing waste, etc., and unintentional discharge activities, including coal-fired power plants, non-ferrous metal smelting, cement production. Inorganic and organic mercury species at a site scale undergone the biogeochemistry cycling of spatial migration and specie transformations, which were required to be considered in further risk assessment. Meanwhile, a conceptual site model (CSM) was established based on the exposure scenario of a typical mercury-contaminated site. It indicated that mercury posed health risks to the human body via various exposure routes, including oral ingestion, inhalation, water drinking, and food intake. Sophisticated risk assessment methods and feasible risk control strategies were discussed based on the practical experiences of the developed countries and actual situation of China. It was concluded that accurate risk assessment based on the mercury biochemical transformation process and risk priority-based classified restoration/risk management might become a scientific, standardized, environmentally friendly and sustainable risk management for mercury-contaminated sites. This work provided a significant basis for site classification and management strategy, which might improve the fulfillment capacity towards the Convention. Finally, the development trend and outlook in risk management of mercury-contaminated sites were also discussed.
  • loading
  • [1]
    姜林, 钟茂生, 张丽娜, 等. 基于风险的中国污染场地管理体系研究[J]. 环境污染与防治, 2014, 36(8): 1-10.
    [2]
    FENG X B, LI P, QIU G L, et al. Human exposure to methylmercury through rice intake in mercury mining areas, Guizhou Province, China[J]. Environment Science & Technology, 2008, 42(1): 326-332.
    [3]
    GOVERNMENT OF CANADA. Mercury: regulations and other management tools, risk Management Strategy for Mercury. Canada2010.
    [4]
    TRASANDE L, LANDRIGAN P J, SCHECHTER C. Public health and economic consequences of methyl mercury toxicity to the developing brain[J]. Environmental Health Perspectives, 2005, 113(5): 590-596.
    [5]
    陈卫平, 谢天, 李笑诺, 等. 欧美发达国家场地土壤污染防治技术体系概述[J]. 土壤学报, 2018, 55(3): 527-542.
    [6]
    姜林, 樊艳玲, 钟茂生, 等. 我国污染场地管理技术标准体系探讨[J]. 环境保护, 2017, 45(9): 38-43.
    [7]
    CAIN A, DISCH S, TWAROSKI C, et al. Substance flow analysis of mercury intentionally used in products in the united states[J]. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 2008, 11(3): 61-75.
    [8]
    LIN Y, WANG S X, WU Q R, et al. Material flow for the intentional use of mercury in China[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2016, 50(5): 2337-2344.
    [9]
    吴清茹. 中国有色金属冶炼行业汞排放特征及减排潜力研究[D]. 北京: 清华大学, 2015.
    [10]
    周瑞, 林青, 于跃, 等. 我国原生汞生产行业典型企业Hg的污染排放特征[J]. 环境科学研究, 2016, 29(5): 664-671.
    [11]
    MACH V, SKALSKY M, PETRLIK J, et al. Chemical plants as a significant soure of mercury contamination in the central and eastern European region, 2nd edition[J]. International Pollutants Elimination Network, Sweden, 2016.
    [12]
    LABUNSKA I, BRIGDEN K, SANTILLO D, et al. The nováky chemical plant (Novácke chemické závody) as a source of mercury and organochlorine contaminants to the Nitra River, Slovakia[R]. University of Exeter, Exeter, UK, 2002.
    [13]
    HIGUERAS P, OYARZUN R, LILLO J, et al. The Almadén district (Spain): anatomy of one of the world’s largest Hg-contaminated sites[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2006, 356(1): 112-124.
    [14]
    HEAVEN S, ILYUSHCHENKO M A, TANTON T W, et al. Mercury in the River Nura and its floodplain, Central Kazakhstan: Ⅰ. River sediments and water[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2000, 260(1): 35-44.
    [15]
    THE WORLD BANK. Implementation completion and results report (Ibrd-46930) an a loan in the amount of US$ 40.39 million to the government of Kazakhstan for the Nura River clean-up project[R]. Europe and Central Asia Region; 2013.
    [16]
    仇广乐. 贵州省典型汞矿地区汞的环境地球化学研究[D]. 贵阳: 中国科学院研究生院(地球化学研究所), 2005.
    [17]
    QIU G L, FENG X B, WANG S F, et al. Mercury and methylmercury in riparian soil, sediments, mine-waste calcines, and moss from abandoned Hg mines in east Guizhou province, southwestern China[J]. Applied Geochemistry, 2005, 20(3): 627-638.
    [18]
    HUI M L, WU Q R, WANG S X, et al. Mercury flows in China and global drivers[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2016, 51(1): 222-231.
    [19]
    赵彬, 易红宏, 唐晓龙, 等. 燃煤烟气汞形态转化及脱除技术[J]. 现代化工, 2015, 35(1): 58-62.
    [20]
    WANG J X, FENG X B, ANDERSON C W N, et al. Remediation of mercury contaminated sites: a review[J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2012, 221/222: 1-18.
    [21]
    RUMAYOR M, GALLEGO J R, RODRIGUEZ-VALDES E, et al. An assessment of the environmental fate of mercury species in highly polluted brownfields by means of thermal desorption[J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2017, 325: 1-7.
    [22]
    李宝磊, 邵春岩, 陈刚, 等. 铜铅锌冶炼行业典型含汞废物处置技术与对策[J]. 环境工程, 2018, 36(8): 134-137.
    [23]
    ZHAO B, YI H H, TANG X L, et al. Copper modified activated coke for mercury removal from coal-fired flue gas[J]. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2016, 286: 585-593.
    [24]
    HE F, GAO J, PIERCE E, et al. In situ remediation technologies for mercury-contaminated soil[J]. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2015, 22(11): 8124-8147.
    [25]
    O’CONNOR D, HOU D Y, OK Y S, et al. Mercury speciation, transformation, and transportation in soils, atmospheric flux, and implications for risk management: a critical review[J]. Environment International, 2019, 126: 747-761.
    [26]
    WANG D Y, SHI X J, WEI S Q. Accumulation and transformation of atmospheric mercury in soil[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2003, 304(1/2/3): 209-214.
    [27]
    GABRIEL M C, WILLIAMSON D G. Principal biogeochemical factors affecting the speciation and transport of mercury through the terrestrial environment[J]. Environmental Geochemistry and Health, 2004, 26(3): 421-434.
    [28]
    WANG J X, SHAHEEN S M, SWERTZ A C, et al. Sulfur-modified organoclay promotes plant uptake and affects geochemical fractionation of mercury in a polluted floodplain soil[J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2019, 371: 687-693.
    [29]
    MAHBUB K R, BAHAR M M, LABBATE M, et al. Bioremediation of mercury: not properly exploited in contaminated soils![J]. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 2017, 101(3): 963-976.
    [30]
    HSU-KIM H, ECKLEY C S, ACHÁ D, et al. Challenges and opportunities for managing aquatic mercury pollution in altered landscapes[J]. Ambio, 2018, 47(2): 141-169.
    [31]
    贾威, 陈金全, 常军军. 汞污染生物修复研究进展[J]. 环境工程, 2020, 38(5): 171-178.
    [32]
    CHRISTENSEN G A, GIONFRIDDO C M, KING A J, et al. Determining the reliability of measuring mercury cycling gene abundance with correlations with mercury and methylmercury concentrations[J]. 2019, 53(15): 8649-8663.
    [33]
    孟其义, 钱晓莉, 陈淼, 等. 稻田生态系统汞的生物地球化学研究进展[J]. 生态学杂志, 2018, 37(5): 1556-1573.
    [34]
    HORVAT M, NOLDE N, FAJON V, et al. Total mercury, methylmercury and selenium in mercury polluted areas in the province Guizhou, China[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2003, 304(1): 231-256.
    [35]
    STEIN E D, COHEN Y, WINER A M. Environmental distribution and transformation of mercury compounds[J]. Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology, 1996, 26(1): 1-43.
    [36]
    LI P, FENG X B, SHANG L H, et al. Mercury pollution from artisanal mercury mining in Tongren, Guizhou, China[J]. Applied Geochemistry, 2008, 23(8): 2055-2064.
    [37]
    CAMPOS J A, ESBRí J M, MADRID M M, et al. Does mercury presence in soils promote their microbial activity? The Almadenejos case (Almadén mercury mining district, Spain)[J]. Chemosphere, 2018, 201: 799-806.
    [38]
    朱小龙, 卢再亮, 魏小芳, 等. 体温计生产企业场地汞污染特征及健康风险评价[J]. 地球环境学报, 2014,5(4): 277-281

    ,291.
    [39]
    孙婷, 李秋华, 唐黎, 等. 贵阳市百花水库消落带土壤汞形态分布及风险评价[J]. 生态环境学报, 2019, 28(4): 831-839.
    [40]
    沈路路, 胡建英, 董兆敏, 等. 中国部分地区汞暴露对儿童健康风险评价[J]. 中国环境科学, 2009, 29(12): 1323-1326.
    [41]
    郑顺安, 唐杰伟, 郑宏艳, 等. 污灌区稻田汞污染特征及健康风险评价[J]. 中国环境科学, 2015, 35(9): 2729-2736.
    [42]
    王芳. 我国土壤环境与污染修复发展策略[J]. 环境工程, 2022, 40(7): 34.
    [43]
    姜林, 梁竞, 钟茂生, 等. 复杂污染场地的风险管理挑战及应对[J]. 环境科学研究, 2021, 34(2): 458-467.
    [44]
    梁刚. 论污染土壤修复在环境治理中的作用[J]. 环境工程, 2021, 39(4): 38.
    [45]
    张永祥, 王晋昊, 井琦, 等. 地下水修复中纳米零价铁材料制备及应用综述[J]. 化工进展, 2021, 40(8): 4486-4496.
    [46]
    刘钊钊, 唐浩, 吴健, 等. 土壤汞污染及其修复技术研究进展[J]. 环境工程, 2013, 31(5): 80-84

    ,109.
    [47]
    余高, 陈芬, 赵成刚, 等. 高分子聚合物与钝化剂复配对汞污染土壤钝化修复研究[J]. 环境工程, 2021, 39(4): 174-179

    ,186.
    [48]
    THE UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY. Engineering Bulletin: Thermal Desorption Treatment[R].1991.
    [49]
    THE UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY. Superfund Remedy Report Fourteenth Edition (EPA-542-R-13-016)[R]. 2013.
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Article Metrics

    Article views (188) PDF downloads(14) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return