EVALUATION AND PROSPECT OF TREATMENT TECHNOLOGY FOR VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS

ZHANG Jiani; XIAO Hailin; LIU Peng; HUANG Haomin; FAN Liya; YE Daiqi

doi:10.13205/j.hjgc.202309007

Volume 41 Issue 9

Sep. 2023

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Article Navigation > ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING > 2023 > 41(9): 54-60

ZHANG Jiani, XIAO Hailin, LIU Peng, HUANG Haomin, FAN Liya, YE Daiqi. EVALUATION AND PROSPECT OF TREATMENT TECHNOLOGY FOR VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2023, 41(9): 54-60. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202309007

Citation:

ZHANG Jiani, XIAO Hailin, LIU Peng, HUANG Haomin, FAN Liya, YE Daiqi. EVALUATION AND PROSPECT OF TREATMENT TECHNOLOGY FOR VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2023, 41(9): 54-60. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202309007

Citation:

PDF( 1895 KB)

EVALUATION AND PROSPECT OF TREATMENT TECHNOLOGY FOR VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS

doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202309007

ZHANG Jiani¹,
XIAO Hailin¹,
LIU Peng^1,2,3,4,
HUANG Haomin^1,2,3,4,
FAN Liya^1,2,3,4,
YE Daiqi^{1,2,3,4
,
,}

1. School of Environment and Energy, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510006, China;
2. National Engineering Laboratory for Volatile Organic Compounds Pollution Control Technology and Equipment, Guangzhou 510006, China;
3. Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Atmospheric Environment and Pollution Control, Guangzhou 510006, China;
4. Guangdong Provincial Engineering and Technology Research Centre for Environmental Risk Prevention and Emergency Disposal, Guangzhou 510006, China

Received Date: 2023-07-19
Available Online: 2023-11-15

Abstract

Abstract

At present, the source substitution technology and process control technology of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in China need to be promoted, and the terminal treatment technology still plays a significant role in ensuring the emission reduction effect of VOCs. Based on the investigation and on-site monitoring, the application status of VOCs treatment techniques in China are obtained, and the technology evaluation and prospects are carried out. The results show that activated carbon adsorption, photocatalysis/photooxidation and their combination are the main VOCs treatment techniques in various industries, accounting for about 86.38%, and there are differences in the application of VOCs treatment techniques in different industries. The measured average removal efficiencies of combustion and its combination technology are the highest, 81.74% and 89.81%, respectively. The measured average removal efficiencies of other non-combustion techniques are all below 80%, especially the average and median measured removal efficiencies of activated carbon adsorption, photocatalysis/photooxidation and their combination technology commonly used by enterprises are lower than 50%, cannot meet the requirements of China's national standards. In practical application, problems such as improper selection of VOCs treatment technology, unreasonable process design, low attention to pretreatment, and unregular operation are more common. In the future, VOCs treatment techniques need to be continuously optimized, upgraded, and innovated, to achieve the synergies of pollution control and carbon reduction.
- volatile organic compounds (VOCs),
- terminal treatment,
- application status,
- technology evaluation,
- prospect

FullText(HTML)

References(30)

References

[1]	ZHANG J, XIAO J, CHEN X, et al. Allowance and allocation of industrial volatile organic compounds emission in China for year 2020 and 2030[J].Journal of Environmental Sciences,2018,69(7):155-165.
[2]	张嘉妮,陈小方,梁小明,等."十三五"挥发性有机物总量控制情景分析[J].环境科学,2018,39(8):3544-3551.
[3]	环境保护部,国家质量监督检验检疫总局.环境空气质量标准:GB 3095-2012[S].北京:中国环境科学出版社, 2012.
[4]	中华人民共和国生态环境部.2017中国生态环境状况公报[R]. 北京:中华人民共和国生态环境部, 2018.
[5]	中华人民共和国生态环境部.2020中国生态环境状况公报[R]. 北京:中华人民共和国生态环境部, 2021.
[6]	中华人民共和国生态环境部.2022中国生态环境状况公报[R]. 北京:中华人民共和国生态环境部, 2023.
[7]	张嘉妮,曾春玲,刘锐源,等.家具企业挥发性有机物排放特征及其环境影响[J].环境科学,2019,40(12):5240-5249.
[8]	魏潇,黄胜,吴幼青,等.VOCs末端治理技术的研究现状[J].环境工程,2023,41(增刊1):338-344.
[9]	余淼霏,杜胜男,米俊锋,等.低温等离子体协同催化处理VOCs的研究进展[J].环境工程,2022,40(8):213-219 ,212.
[10]	华承贺,谭效时,关攀博,等.船舶行业挥发性有机物(VOCs)产生及治理技术研究[J].应用化工,2023,52(5):1565-1568 ,1575.
[11]	孙豆,王云刚,戴艳俊,等.挥发性有机物治理现状及处理技术分析[J].动力工程学报,2023,43(5):641-654.
[12]	刘宗耀,曾永辉,刘俊伟,等.挥发性有机物末端治理技术研究进展[J].现代化工,2022,42(3):74-78 ,84.
[13]	代雪萍,王焱,谢晓峰,等.挥发性有机物治理技术研究现状[J].材料工程,2020,48(11):1-8.
[14]	费波,张钢锋,卜梦雅,等.蜂窝活性炭与沸石分子筛对涂装VOCs废气的吸脱附性能对比[J].环境工程,2023,41(3):90-96.
[15]	马晓东.皮革行业污水处理站含挥发性有机物废气的治理工艺[J].环境工程,2023,41(增刊1):332-334.
[16]	郭送军,王俊辉,陈来国,等.印刷行业挥发性有机物深度治理对策建议[J].环境工程,2023,41(3):202-209 ,228.
[17]	高宗江,李成,郑君瑜,等.工业源VOCs治理技术效果实测评估[J].环境科学研究,2015,28(6):994-1000.
[18]	金月正,金磊,吴义诚,等.厦门市工业源VOCs治理技术及区域性治理效果评估[J].环境工程学报,2021,15(6):1956-1965.
[19]	苏伟健,徐绮坤,黎碧霞,等.工业源重点行业VOCs治理技术处理效果的研究[J].环境工程,2016,34(增刊1):518-522,451.
[20]	杜长明,张路路,王刚,等.汽车4S店有机废气治理技术分析[J].环境工程,2016,34(增刊1):468-470.
[21]	陈世杰.4S店VOCs废气治理方式探讨[J].资源节约与环保,2015(5):128,135.
[22]	田静. 新乡市典型工业VOCs控制技术综合评估分析[D].郑州:郑州大学,2019.
[23]	胡启迪. 炼油项目VOCs治理经济与环境效益研究[D].北京:中国石油大学(北京),2021.
[24]	武宁. 河南省典型行业VOCs排放控制技术体系与成本-效益研究[D].郑州:郑州大学,2020.
[25]	王庆九,李洁,杨峰.南京市VOCs治理成本分析与污费征收策略研究[J].安徽农学通报,2017,23(22):82-84.
[26]	秦颖. 典型行业VOCs排污收费政策设计[D].郑州:郑州大学,2015.
[27]	张瑜,羌宁,李世杰.大风量、低浓度非连续排放有机废气治理的经济性探讨[J].四川环境,2019,38(5):138-145.
[28]	李瑞芃,和慧,邵蕊,等.青岛市工业源VOCs治理技术应用及环境治理成本分析[J].环境保护科学,2023,49(1):110-116.
[29]	栾志强,郝郑平,王喜芹.工业固定源VOCs治理技术分析评估[J].环境科学,2011,32(12):3476-3486.
[30]	邱凌,甘茂林,罗丹琦,等.四川省主要行业挥发性有机物治理成本及征税策略研究[J].四川环境,2022,41(6):312-318.