CARBON EMISSION CALCULATION AND ANALYSIS FOR CURED-IN-PLACE REHABILITATION OF URBAN DRAINAGE PIPELINE

MA Tao; GUO Yuehua; WANG Weiwei; CAO Jingguo

doi:10.13205/j.hjgc.202311011

Volume 41 Issue 11

Nov. 2023

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Abstract

References

Article Navigation > ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING > 2023 > 41(11): 54-58,63

MA Tao, GUO Yuehua, WANG Weiwei, CAO Jingguo. CARBON EMISSION CALCULATION AND ANALYSIS FOR CURED-IN-PLACE REHABILITATION OF URBAN DRAINAGE PIPELINE[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2023, 41(11): 54-58,63. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202311011

Citation:

MA Tao, GUO Yuehua, WANG Weiwei, CAO Jingguo. CARBON EMISSION CALCULATION AND ANALYSIS FOR CURED-IN-PLACE REHABILITATION OF URBAN DRAINAGE PIPELINE[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2023, 41(11): 54-58,63. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202311011

Citation:

PDF( 2046 KB)

CARBON EMISSION CALCULATION AND ANALYSIS FOR CURED-IN-PLACE REHABILITATION OF URBAN DRAINAGE PIPELINE

doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202311011

1. College of Chemical Engineering and Materials Science, Tianjin University of Science & Technology, Tianjin 300457, China;
2. CCCC-FHEC Ecological Engineering Co., Ltd., Shenzhen 518107, China;
3. China Urban Construction Design &. Research Institute Co., Ltd., Beijing 100120, China

Received Date: 2023-08-28
Available Online: 2023-12-25

Abstract

Abstract

From a sustainable development perspective, reducing the carbon emissions of municipal facilities is an important step towards the development of ecological civilization. Trenchless pipeline rehabilitation, which is energy-saving, environmentally friendly, and low-carbon, represents a major trend in the pipeline repairing industry. In this paper, based on a case of pipeline network repairment in Shehong City, Sichuan Province, carbon footprint tracking of the pipeline repair material production stage, material and equipment transportation stage, and construction stage was conducted. The results showed that the carbon emissions during the production stage were 11263.14 kg CO₂e, while those during the transportation and construction stages were 134.78 kg CO₂e and 539.12 kg CO₂e, respectively, accounting for approximately 94.35%, 1.13%, and 4.52% of the total carbon emissions. Material production was found to be the largest carbon emissions stage, and thus it is the key to carbon emissions controlling in the CIPP process. Sensitivity analysis was conducted on the materials and energy used during the production. The resin was found to be the most sensitive, followed by non-woven fabric. Optimizing and controlling their usage will be important for reducing carbon emissions in cured-in-place rehabilitation of urban drainage pipeline.
- carbon emission,
- cured-in-place pipe rehabilitation,
- trenchless rehabilitation techniques,
- lifecycle,
- emotional analysis

FullText(HTML)

References(14)

References

[1]	GUAN Y R, SHAN Y L, HUANG Q, et al.Assessment to China's recent emission pattern shifts[J].Earths Future, 2021, 9(11).
[2]	国家发展改革委发布"碳达峰十大行动"进展报告[J].资源再生, 2023(5):60-71.
[3]	卫佳, 许怀奥, 方帅, 等.非开挖修复技术用于大口径截污管道改造工程[J].中国给水排水, 2023, 39(10):126-132.
[4]	李旦罡, 遆仲森.城市地下管线非开挖修复更新技术的探讨[J].城市勘测, 2018(增刊1):247-250.
[5]	KAUSHAL V, NAJAFI M, SERAJIANTEHRANI R.Environmental impacts of conventional open-cut pipeline installation and trenchless technology methods:state-of-the-art review[J].Journal of Pipeline Systems Engineering and Practice, 2020, 11(2):1-9.
[6]	曹俊, 崔熙, 刘利, 等.非开挖管道修复技术的碳足迹分析[J].石油管材与仪器, 2023, 9(1):23-27.
[7]	刘沐宇, 欧阳丹.桥梁工程生命周期碳排放计算方法[J].土木建筑与环境工程, 2011, 33(增刊1):125-129.
[8]	赵苏苏, 朱建国, 王泽, 等.基于LCA的建筑碳排放计算及减排策略研究:以某住宅工程为例[J].建筑经济, 2023, 44(增刊1):371-378.
[9]	田琪, 叶建州, 闻雪, 等.《城镇排水管道原位固化修复用内衬软管》团标解读[J].中国给水排水, 2022, 38(8):108-113.
[10]	赵年花, 周翔, 董锋.涤纶纺织品的碳足迹评估[J].印染, 2012, 38(14):42-45.
[11]	ALSADI A, MATTHEWS J C, MATTHEWS E.Environmental impact assessment of the fabrication of pipe rehabilitation materials[J].Journal of Pipeline Systems Engineering and Practice, 2020, 11(1):1-7.
[12]	曹井国, 石东优, 张文宁, 等.城镇排水管渠原位固化修复材料工程示范[J].给水排水, 2020, 56(1):115-119.
[13]	ALSADI A A, MATTHEWS J C.Evaluation of carbon footprint of pipeline materials during installation, operation, and disposal phases[J].Journal of Pipeline Systems Engineering and Practice, 2020, 11(2):1-13.
[14]	陈进杰, 王兴举, 王祥琴, 等.高速铁路全生命周期碳排放计算[J].铁道学报, 2016, 38(12):47-55.

Relative Articles

[1]	LI Qingpo, PENG Jianping, LIU Xingjian, WANG Yaowu, DI Yuezhong. Carbon emission analysis of primary aluminum production in China based on energy consumption[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2025, 43(1): 21-30. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202501003
[2]	GANG Qinyan, MA Xiaoqian, LIU Chao, WANG Han, WANG Yayi. RESEARCH ON CARBON EMISSION CHARACTERISTICS OF MUNICIPAL SOLID WASTE INCINERATION LEACHATE TREATMENT SYSTEM[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2024, 42(4): 31-39. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202404004
[3]	WU Yiqi, YIN Xiaoqing. STUDY ON STANDARDS ON CARBON EMISSION IN MUNICIPAL WATER SUPPLY AND DRAINAGE SYSTEMS[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2024, 42(11): 146-152. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202411016
[4]	WANG Hang, WANG Xiankai, CHEN Xiang, LI Kun, QIAO Xueyuan, LIU Feng, DONG Bin. CARBON EMISSION ANALYSIS OF COLLABORATIVE TREATMENT OF MUNICIPAL ORGANIC SOLID WASTE[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2024, 42(2): 66-72. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202402008
[5]	ZHANG Wanjun, CHEN Dan, HU Le, SUN Hao, JI Wei. STUDY ON A CARBON EMISSION METHOD FOR SMALL IRRIGATION PUMPING STATIONS BASED ON HYBRID LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT THEORY[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2024, 42(2): 211-219. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202402025
[6]	DU Jiamin, WEI Yuanyuan, DING Chao, ZHU Haochuan, LIU Weijing, TANG Baiyang, YANG Shiyao, FENG Qian. RESEARCH ON LAYOUT OF INTERCEPTION COMBINED SEWER OVERFLOW DETENTION TANKS BASED ON THEIR LIFE CYCLE CARBON EMISSIONS[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2024, 42(11): 50-60. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202411006
[7]	WANG Zhiqiang, LI Kehui, REN Jin'ge, ZHANG Qi. INFLUENTIAL FACTORS AND SCENARIO FORECAST OF CARBON EMISSIONS OF CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY IN SHANDONG PROVINCE BASED ON LMDI-SD MODEL[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2023, 41(10): 108-116. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202310014
[8]	WANG Shuo, LU Yunping, LIU Shuyang, CHEN Kangli. CARBON EMISSIONS OF URBAN AND INDUSTRIAL SEWAGE TREATMENT PLANTS OF SUZHOU[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2023, 41(10): 173-184. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202310021
[9]	CHEN Chen, LI Wei, ZHAI Mengyu, BAO Zhe, WANG Zhenyu, ZHU Liangliang. IMPACT OF INTER-REGIONAL TRADE ON SHANGHAI’S ENERGY-RELATED CARBON EMISSIONS[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2023, 41(10): 245-252,259. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202310028
[10]	REN Hongyang, DU Ruolan, XIE Guilin, JIN Wenhui, LI Xi, DENG Yuanpeng, MA Wei, WANG Bing. RESEARCH STATUS OF INFLUENCING FACTORS AND IDENTIFICATION METHODS OF CARBON EMISSIONS IN CHINA[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2023, 41(10): 195-203,244. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202310023
[11]	YU Jie, ZHANG Yong, LI Qingyao. DECOUPLING EFFECT AND DRIVING MECHANISM OF CARBON EMISSION REDUCTION IN MANUFACTURING INDUSTRY: A TWO-DIMENSIONAL ANALYSIS FRAMEWORK[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2023, 41(10): 150-162. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202310019
[12]	WU Qixian, XIE Xinyan, CHEN Yun, JIN Ziyi. ANALYSIS OF FACTORS INFLUENCING CARBON EMISSIONS OF URBAN RAIL TRANSIT PROJECTS BASED ON PARTIAL LEAST SQUARES STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2023, 41(10): 133-140. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202310017
[13]	WANG Zhiqi, LI Jianguo, PENG Binbin, XIANG Wanli. DRIVING FACTORS AND DECOUPLING EFFECT ANALYSIS OF TRANSPORTATION CARBON EMISSIONS IN WESTERN CHINA[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2023, 41(10): 213-222. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202310025
[14]	LI Jianyuan, SUN Yunan, HUANG Jiale, CHEN Qijing, JIA Yue, GAO Yule, CHENG Zhanjun, YAN Beibei, CHEN Guanyi. CARBON EMISSION ANALYSIS OF WASTE BIODEGRADABLE PLASTICS BY DIFFERENT DISPOSAL TECHNOLOGIES[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2023, 41(9): 124-132. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202309015
[15]	LUO Yuli, PAN Yirong, MA Jiaxin, WANG Jiayuan, LI Chunyao, CHEN Zhenpeng, WANG Xu. RESEARCH ADVANCES ON CARBON EMISSION OF WASTEWATER RESOURCE RECOVERY AND VALORIZATION[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(6): 83-91,187. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202206011
[16]	WANG Zhaoyue, ZHAO Xiaying, TANG Linhui, LIU Yu, CHENG Huiyu, PAN Yirong, YAN Xu, WANG Xu. RESEARCH ADVANCES IN CARBON EMISSION MONITORING AND ASSESSMENT OF URBAN DRAINAGE AND WASTEWATER TREATMENT SYSTEMS[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(6): 77-82,161. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202206010
[17]	ZHAO Gang, TANG Jianguo, XU Jingcheng, LUO Jingyang, JIANG Ming, YUAN Xianchen, ZHOU Chuanting. COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS ON ENERGY AND CARBON EMISSION OF TYPICAL SLUDGE TREATMENT PROJECTS IN CHINA AND THE UNITED STATES[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(12): 9-16. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202212002
[18]	YANG Nan, LI Yan-xia, LV Chen, ZHAO Meng, LIU Zhong-liang, LIU Hao. CARBON EMISSION ACCOUNTING AND PEAK FORECASTING OF IRON & STEEL INDUSTRY IN TANGSHAN[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2020, 38(11): 44-52. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202011008
[19]	Yang Quan Yang Hongxing Lv Jian, . COMPREHENSIVE BENEFIT ANALYSIS OF GROUND SOURCE HEAT PUMP SYSTEM[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2015, 33(4): 128-131. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.201504027
[20]	STUDY OF CARBON EMISSION UNDER CHANGE IN LAND USE PATTERNS IN TAIHANG MOUNTAIN AREA OF HEBEI PROVINCE[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2014, 32(12): 133-135. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.201412024

Supplements(0)

Cited By

Cited by

Periodical cited type(5)

1.	张辰. 基于Info Works ICM水力模型的排水管道负荷分析方法. 工程建设与设计. 2025(02): 31-33 .
2.	石伟新. 面向极端降雨的市政给排水工程设计研究. 工程建设与设计. 2025(05): 63-65 .
3.	刘自君，段建义. 城镇排水管道紫外光内衬固化修复施工难点及对策分析. 工程技术研究. 2024(02): 220-222 .
4.	付亚平. 非洲排水管道聚合物灌浆修复纤维掺量及其修复效果分析. 铁道建筑技术. 2024(09): 183-185+190 .
5.	梁秋生. 给排水管道修复材料补强性能研究. 水利技术监督. 2024(11): 185-187 .