Source Journal of CSCD
Source Journal for Chinese Scientific and Technical Papers
Core Journal of RCCSE
Included in JST China
Volume 41 Issue 12
Dec.  2023
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
YOU Yangyang, LIANG Zengqiang, HUO Ning. GROUNDWATER EVALUATION OF INFORMAL LANDFILLS BASED ON WATER QUALITY IDENTIFICATION INDEX METHOD[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2023, 41(12): 264-269,311. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202312033
Citation: YOU Yangyang, LIANG Zengqiang, HUO Ning. GROUNDWATER EVALUATION OF INFORMAL LANDFILLS BASED ON WATER QUALITY IDENTIFICATION INDEX METHOD[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2023, 41(12): 264-269,311. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202312033

GROUNDWATER EVALUATION OF INFORMAL LANDFILLS BASED ON WATER QUALITY IDENTIFICATION INDEX METHOD

doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202312033
  • Received Date: 2022-10-24
    Available Online: 2024-03-08
  • In order to accurately evaluate the difference between poor Class V water quality and similar water quality, the water quality identification index method was introduced to evaluate the groundwater quality of typical informal landfill. The results showed that the single factor water quality evaluation results of ammonia nitrogen, permanganate index and chloride index were from 66.362 to 255.3251, 13.89 to 40.036 and 15.111 to 21.417, respectively, due to the direct contact between shallow groundwater and domestic garbage leachate. The comprehensive evaluation results of groundwater quality at each monitoring point are 9.645~25.9521, all of which are inferior category V. The lowest values were found in the pre-2005 landfill area. Due to the effective barrier effect of the water barrier layer on the pollutants, the water quality of the micro-confined water is significantly better than that of the diving layer, and the comprehensive evaluation results of groundwater quality at each monitoring point are 3.100~3.700. From the spatial distribution characteristics, there are significant differences in the single factor water quality evaluation results of submersible or microconfined water in different landfills. There are significant differences in the comprehensive evaluation results of diving water quality in different landfill areas, but there is no significant difference in the comprehensive evaluation results of microconfined water. The research results can be used as reference for groundwater quality assessment and environmental management of landfill sites in China.
  • loading
  • [1]
    张宝,彭志帆,赵锁志.地下水资源研究现状及展望[J].西部资源,2012(2):87-88.
    [2]
    周巧丽,宋玉梅,周漪波,等.广州市某生活垃圾填埋场空气及地下水污染状况分析[J].环境化学,2019,38(4):760-769.
    [3]
    旦增,周鹏,周文武,等.西藏日喀则市垃圾填埋场地下水环境质量评价[J].环境工程,2019,37(5):200-205.
    [4]
    孙秀国.指数评价法和模糊数学评价法在地下水水质评价中的应用比较[J].地下水,2022,44(2):56-58.
    [5]
    贾超,杨霄,刘森,等.基于指数分析和GIS方法的垃圾填埋场地下水环境影响分析[J].环境工程,2021,39(4):156-163.
    [6]
    周睿,吴玲,簿丝,等.深圳简易垃圾填埋场水土环境污染指标识别[J].中国环境科学,2022,42(3):1287-1294.
    [7]
    徐祖信.我国河流单因子水质标识指数评价方法研究[J].同济大学学报(自然科学版),2005,33(3):321-325.
    [8]
    徐祖信.我国河流综合水质标识指数评价方法研究[J].同济大学学报(自然科学版),2005,33(4):482-488.
    [9]
    胡成,苏丹.综合水质标识指数法在浑河水质评价中的应用[J].生态环境学报,2011,20(1):186-192.
    [10]
    梁增强,马民涛,杜改芳.基于信息熵权改进综合水质标识指数法及应用[J].四川环境,2013,32(3):38-42.
    [11]
    何俊宝,姚庆军,韩志梅,等.天津滨海新区(海河以南)生活垃圾调查及分析[J].环境卫生工程,2010,18(2):7-10.
    [12]
    杨娜,邵立明,何品晶.我国城市生活垃圾组分含水率及其特征分析[J].中国环境科学,2018,38(3):1033-1038.
    [13]
    胡馨然,杨斌,韩智勇,等.中国正规、非正规生活垃圾填埋场地下水中典型污染指标特性比较分析[J].环境科学学报,2019,39(9):3025-3038.
    [14]
    雷抗,李瑞,李鸣晓,等.海积平原区浅层地下水污染在线监测预警指标的确定:以天津市某简易生活垃圾填埋场为例[J].环境工程,2018,36(11):179-184.
    [15]
    叶兆勇,杨禹,侯立安.垃圾填埋场地下水相关研究的研究热点与趋势:基于CiteSpace的可视化分析[J].环境工程,2021,39(6):65-71.
    [16]
    中华人民共和国国家质量监督检验检疫总局,中国国家标准化管理委员会.地下水质量标准: GB/T 14848—2017[S].北京:中国标准出版社,2017.
    [17]
    中华人民共和国住房和城乡建设部.生活垃圾采样和分析方法:CJ/T 313—2009[S].北京:中国标准出版社,2009.
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Article Metrics

    Article views (56) PDF downloads(3) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return