A CASE ANALYSIS OF EXCAVATION OF THE EXISTING MUNICIPAL SOLID WASTE IN THE LANDFILL IN SOUTHERN CHINA

ZHANG Xiaogang; QI Tian; SONG Shuxiang; CHEN Binrong; ZHANG Yufei; CHEN Xiaoqiang; ZHANG Le; LI Cihua; LI Yiming

doi:10.13205/j.hjgc.202405012

Volume 42 Issue 5

May 2024

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Article Navigation > ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING > 2024 > 42(5): 90-97

ZHANG Xiaogang, QI Tian, SONG Shuxiang, CHEN Binrong, ZHANG Yufei, CHEN Xiaoqiang, ZHANG Le, LI Cihua, LI Yiming. A CASE ANALYSIS OF EXCAVATION OF THE EXISTING MUNICIPAL SOLID WASTE IN THE LANDFILL IN SOUTHERN CHINA[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2024, 42(5): 90-97. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202405012

Citation:

ZHANG Xiaogang, QI Tian, SONG Shuxiang, CHEN Binrong, ZHANG Yufei, CHEN Xiaoqiang, ZHANG Le, LI Cihua, LI Yiming. A CASE ANALYSIS OF EXCAVATION OF THE EXISTING MUNICIPAL SOLID WASTE IN THE LANDFILL IN SOUTHERN CHINA[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2024, 42(5): 90-97. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202405012

Citation:

ZHANG Xiaogang, QI Tian, SONG Shuxiang, CHEN Binrong, ZHANG Yufei, CHEN Xiaoqiang, ZHANG Le, LI Cihua, LI Yiming. A CASE ANALYSIS OF EXCAVATION OF THE EXISTING MUNICIPAL SOLID WASTE IN THE LANDFILL IN SOUTHERN CHINA[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2024, 42(5): 90-97. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202405012

PDF( 4261 KB)

A CASE ANALYSIS OF EXCAVATION OF THE EXISTING MUNICIPAL SOLID WASTE IN THE LANDFILL IN SOUTHERN CHINA

doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202405012

1. Grandtop Environmental Service Co., Ltd., Guangzhou 510540, China;
2. Guangzhou Environmental Protection Investment Group Co., Ltd., Guangzhou 510170, China;
3. Guangzhou Huanjing Environmental Protection Engineering Co., Ltd., Guangzhou 510540, China

Received Date: 2023-07-26
Available Online: 2024-07-11

Abstract

Abstract

To investigate the working conditions and design parameters of excavation of the existing municipal solid waste (MSW) from the landfill, a large-scale study of excavation was conducted on the landfill in southern China after the pilot-scale study. The results showed that: 1) the continuity of operations of the bucket wheel excavator was poor with an efficiency lower than 50 t/h; 2) the densities of waste samples after excavation were decreased by about 34%, compared to 1.04 t/m³ of that in the original condition; 3) the average efficiency of load was about 6 vehicles per hour, which composed 46% of the design value, and continuity of operations was mainly affected by the dispatch of the MSW incineration plant; 4) within 1 to 18 hours, with the extension of continuous operation time, the excavation efficiency generally increased and then decreased, with a maximum value appearing near 10 hours, and there were differences in the distributions of excavation efficiency among day, night and crossing-day-night, and it was advisable to choose crossing-day-night operation; 5) the concentration levels of six pollutants in the air of the monitoring points of the landfill boundary and the excavation area were generally low, but the data were not enough to analyze the impact of excavation, and the rapid monitoring of air should be strengthened when the weight of waste excavated on one hour exceeding 180 t; 6) the amount of leachate and rainfall changed synchronously after excavation, and the amount of leachate after excavation was consistent with the amount of the two months before excavation, indicating that excavation did not cause an increase in the amount of leachate. The above results could provide a reference for the formal design of excavation engineering.
- the landfill,
- existing municipal solid waste,
- excavate,
- large-scale,
- impact analysis

FullText(HTML)

References(34)

References

[1]	王英达, 李洵, 吴小雯, 等. 城镇生活垃圾填埋场开采的可行性评估体系[J]. 环境工程, 2022, 40(3): 181-187 ,202.
[2]	占松林, 高磊, 周克斌. 存量生活垃圾填埋场治理方式及商业模式的探讨[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2022, 30(6): 11-15.
[3]	严陈玲. 德国生活垃圾填埋场开挖经验借鉴[J]. 再生资源与循环经济, 2022, 15(5): 42-46.
[4]	侯成林, 唐行鹏, 田娇, 等. 陈腐生活垃圾处理处置工程设计实例[J]. 环境工程, 2016, 34(1): 96-99 ,60.
[5]	贺菡琰. 基于不同沸石催化剂的陈腐垃圾与玉米秸秆共热解机理[D]. 广州: 华南理工大学, 2022.
[6]	白秀佳, 张红玉, 顾军, 等. 填埋场陈腐垃圾理化特性与资源化利用研究[J]. 环境工程, 2021, 39(2): 116-120 ,124.
[7]	赵文阀, 孙力, 厉江锋, 等. 淮北东湖存量垃圾治理工程案例[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2022, 30(3): 105-107.
[8]	张焕亨. 陈腐垃圾成分特性及其与原生垃圾掺烧研究[J]. 广东化工, 2021, 48(9): 193-195 ,177.
[9]	李水江, 张效刚, 谈强, 等. 我国南方某生活垃圾填埋场存量垃圾直接开挖掺烧中试[J]. 环境工程, 2023, 41(8): 196-201.
[10]	尹文华, 龙世康, 何志远, 等. 陈腐垃圾掺烧对垃圾焚烧烟气中污染物排放的影响[J]. 环境工程, 2022, 40(7): 76-80 ,87.
[11]	李德波, 陈兆立, 陈智豪, 等. 垃圾焚烧炉掺烧陈腐垃圾及其配风优化的数值模拟[J]. 环境工程, 2022, 40(11): 113-119.
[12]	李水江, 吴宁, 周卫东, 等. 一种填埋场垃圾开挖方法:广东,CN116104098A[P]. 2023-05-12.
[13]	李雄, 徐迪民, 赵由才, 等. 生活垃圾填埋场开采研究[J]. 同济大学学报(自然科学版), 2006, 34(10): 1365-1368.
[14]	张雨晨. 老生活垃圾堆放场开挖技术及其渗滤液典型污染物去除实验研究[D]. 武汉: 华中科技大学, 2022.
[15]	廖利, 李敏. 探讨垃圾填埋场开采回用工程[J]. 江苏环境科技, 2006, 19(3): 32-34.
[16]	宋树祥, 林静宇, 陈晓强, 等. 一种开挖除臭装置: 广东,CN219252188U[P]. 2023-06-27.
[17]	张玉飞, 王薇, 李桂标, 等. 一种垃圾堆体开挖前除臭装置: 广东,CN219252192U[P]. 2023-06-27.
[18]	杨槟赫, 曹占强, 葛亚军, 等. 一种用于生活垃圾填埋场开挖过程密闭覆盖工艺: 北京,CN113522919B[P]. 2022-09-02.
[19]	赵先. 陈垃圾开采回用工程的综合效益评价研究[D]. 武汉: 华中科技大学, 2008.
[20]	张艳. 垃圾土环境中深基坑工程开挖难点与措施研究[D]. 青岛: 中国海洋大学, 2013.
[21]	浙江省环保产业协会. 生活垃圾填埋场开挖筛分技术规范:T/ZAEPI 003—2022[S].2022.
[22]	生态环境部. 环境空气总悬浮颗粒物的测定重量法:HJ 1263—2022[S].2022.
[23]	中华人民共和国环境保护部. 环境空气氨的测定次氯酸钠—水杨酸分光光度法:HJ 534—2009[S].2009.
[24]	国家环境保护总局. 空气和废气监测分析方法(第四版增补版)[M]. 北京: 中国环境科学出版社, 2003.
[25]	国家环境保护总局. 空气质量硫化氢、甲硫醇、甲硫醚和二甲二硫的测定气相色谱法:GB/T 14678—1993[S].1993.
[26]	环境保护部. 环境空气总烃、甲烷和非甲烷总烃的测定直接进样—气相色谱法:HJ 604—2017[S].2017.
[27]	国家环境保护总局. 空气质量恶臭的测定三点比较式臭袋法:GB/T 14675—1993[S].1993.
[28]	中华人民共和国生态环境部. 环境空气质量标准:GB 3095—2012[S].2012.
[29]	环境保护部, 国家质量监督检验检疫总局. 生活垃圾填埋场污染控制标准:GB 16889—2008[S].2008.
[30]	中华人民共和国生态环境部. 恶臭污染物排放标准:GB 14554—1993[S].1993.
[31]	陈海滨, 杨伦全, 刘锦权. 垃圾填埋场设计计算中垃圾密度的取值[J]. 环境卫生工程, 1996(2): 11-15.
[32]	朱水元, 刘钊, 詹良通. 城市生活垃圾填埋密度及其随深度分布规律[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2010, 18(5): 53-56.
[33]	涂帆, 钱学德. 中美垃圾填埋场垃圾土的重度、含水量和相对密度[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2008, 27(增刊1): 3075-3081.
[34]	CJ/T 313—2009, 生活垃圾采样和分析方法[S].