Public perception bias of air pollution risk based on semantic analysis and decoupling theory

XIONG Xin; QIU Jianhong; ZHAO Rui; REN Xinyun

doi:10.13205/j.hjgc.202602019

Volume 44 Issue 2

Feb. 2026

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Article Navigation > ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING > 2026 > 44(2): 169-178

XIONG Xin, QIU Jianhong, ZHAO Rui, REN Xinyun. Public perception bias of air pollution risk based on semantic analysis and decoupling theory[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2026, 44(2): 169-178. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202602019

Citation:

XIONG Xin, QIU Jianhong, ZHAO Rui, REN Xinyun. Public perception bias of air pollution risk based on semantic analysis and decoupling theory[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2026, 44(2): 169-178. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202602019

Citation:

PDF( 1496 KB)

Public perception bias of air pollution risk based on semantic analysis and decoupling theory

doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202602019

School of Environmental Science and Engineering, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu 611756, China

Received Date: 2025-03-18
Available Online: 2026-04-11
Publish Date: 2026-02-01

Abstract

Abstract

Air pollution poses serious challenges to both the environment and human health. Influenced by individual sensory characteristics （such as visual sense） and environmental context （such as visibility）， the public often struggles to accurately assess air pollution risk levels. By integrating textual semantic analysis with decoupling theory， this study proposed a novel Public Air Pollution Risk Perception Bias Index to quantify the gap between subjective risk perception and actual risk levels， taking Chengdu as a case study for empirical analysis. Results showed that： 1） In the years with more frequent air pollution warnings and the autumn and winter seasons with more severe air pollution， the number of air pollution-related texts peaked， indicating heightened public concern during these periods. 2） There are seasonal differences in the public’s subjective risk perception scores of air pollution， with average values of -1.5 in autumn and winter， and 4.9 in spring and summer. This indicates that the public subjectively perceives air pollution to pose greater health risks during autumn and winter seasons. 3） A discrepancy existed between the public’s subjective risk perception and the actual risk levels， with both overestimation and underestimation occurring. In autumn and winter， due to the more direct and intense sensory impact of pollutants， which mainly consisted of particulate matter such as PM_2.5and PM₁₀， the proportion of overestimating the risk （26.9%） was significantly higher than that in spring and summer （15.1%）. 4） On the one hand， regulatory authorities should develop differentiated pollutant control strategies based on the seasonal characteristics of pollution； On the other hand， they should strengthen public awareness and accurate understanding of air pollution risks through information dissemination and public education.
- air pollution,
- risk perception,
- risk perception bias,
- text semantic analysis,
- decoupling elasticity index

FullText(HTML)

References(36)

References

[1]	SING T，WANG W，ZHAN C. Tracking industry pollution sources and health risks in China［J］. Scientific Reports，2023，13（1）:22232.
[2]	TIAN Y，LIU X，HUO R，et al. Organic compound source profiles of PM_2.5 from traffic emissions，coal combustion，industrial processes and dust［J］. Chemosphere，2021，278:130429.
[3]	YOO E，PU Q，EUM Y，et al. The impact of individual mobility on long-term exposure to ambient PM_2.5:assessing effect modification by travel patterns and spatial variability of PM_2.5［J］. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health，2021，18（4）:2194.
[4]	DI CLEMENTE R，STRANO E，BATTY M. Urbanization and economic complexity［J］. Scientific Reports，2021，11（1）:3952.
[5]	SALMAN M Y，HASAR H. Review on environmental aspects in smart city concept:water，waste，air pollution and transportation smart applications using IoT techniques［J］. Sustainable Cities and Society，2023，94:104567.
[6]	Ministry of Ecology and Environment，People’s Republic of China. Report on the state of the ecology and environment in China 2023［R］. Beijing，Ministry of Ecology and Environment，2024:3-4. 中华人民共和国生态环境部. 2023年中国生态环境状况公报［R］. 北京:中华人民共和国生态环境部，2024:3-4.
[7]	RENTSCHLER J，LEONOVA N. Global air pollution exposure and poverty［J］. Nature Communications，2023，14（1）:4432.
[8]	CAO Z，ZHOU J，LI M，et al. Urbanites’ mental health undermined by air pollution［J］. Nature Sustainability，2023，6（5）:470-478.
[9]	SLOVIC P. Risk perception［M］// TRAVIS C C. Carcinogen Risk Assessment. New York:Springer，1988:171-181.
[10]	ZHAO R，LIU J，Z Y Y，et al. Risk perception towards atmospheric environment based on text datamining of public opinions［J］. Environmental Engineering，2022，40（4）:209-216. 赵锐，刘婕，周宇羽，等. 基于环境舆情文本挖掘的大气环境风险感知评价［J］. 环境工程，2022，40（4）:209-216.
[11]	LU B F，LIU B B. Analysis of public risk perception on haze and suggestions for improving risk communication［J］. Sichuan Environment，2022，41（6）:93-99. 陆卜梵，刘蓓蓓. 公众对霾的风险感知研究及风险交流改善建议［J］. 四川环境，2022，41（6）:93-99.
[12]	HUANG J，YANG J. Beyond under the dome:an environmental documentary amplified public risk perception about air pollution in China［J］. Journal of Risk Research，2020，23（2）:227-241.
[13]	PU S，SHAO Z，FANG M，et al. Spatial distribution of the public’s risk perception for air pollution:a nationwide study in China［J］. Science of the Total Environment，2019，655:454-462.
[14]	HUANG L，RAO C，van der KUIJP T J，et al. A comparison of individual exposure，perception，and acceptable levels of PM_2.5 with air pollution policy objectives in China［J］. Environmental Research，2017，157:78-86.
[15]	LI W，YANG G，LI X. Correlation between PM_2.5 pollution and its public concern in China:evidence from Baidu Index［J］. Journal of Cleaner Production，2021，293:126091.
[16]	LONG Y，ZHENG D，WEI Y，et al. Impact of risk perception on intrapersonal heterogeneity in decision-making processes by air pollution context:a latent variable and latent class regret-utility approach［J］. Journal of Cleaner Production，2023，428:139305.
[17]	SCAMMELL M K. Qualitative environmental health research:an analysis of the literature，1991—2008［J］. Environmental Health Perspectives，2010，118（8）:1146-1154.
[18]	NOËL C，van LANDSCHOOT L，VANROELEN C，et al. The public’s perceptions of air pollution. What’s in a name？［J］. Environmental Health Insights，2022，16:211-235.
[19]	DONG D，XU X，XU W，et al. The relationship between the actual level of air pollution and residents’ concern about air pollution:evidence from Shanghai，China［J］. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health，2019，16（23）:4784.
[20]	YE B，KRISHNAN P，JIA S. Public concern about air pollution and related health outcomes on social media in China:an analysis of data from Sina Weibo（Chinese Twitter）and air monitoring stations［J］. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health，2022，19（23）:16115.
[21]	LI M，CH'NG E，CHONG A，et al. The new eye of smart city:novel citizen sentiment analysis in Twitter［C］// International Conference on Audio，IEEE. Shanghai:Language and Image Processing，2016:557-562.
[22]	BAO Q，ZHANG X，WU X，et al. Research on public environmental perception of emotion，taking haze as an example［J］. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health，2021，18:2115.
[23]	MADJAR A，GJORSHOSKA I，PRODANOVA J，et al. Western Balkan societies’ awareness of air pollution. Estimations using natural language processing techniques［J］. Ecological Informatics，2023，75:102097.
[24]	YE J T，WANG Y. Research on environmental risk perception bias of megacities:findings based on survey data of urban communities in Shanghai［J］. Urban Problems，2022（3）:76-83. 叶锦涛，王阳. 特大城市居民环境风险感知偏差研究:基于上海都市社区调查数据的发现［J］. 城市问题，2022（3）:76-83.
[25]	LI Q，XIA M，GUO X，et al. Spatial characteristics and influencing factors of risk perception of haze in China:the case study of publishing online comments about haze news on Sina［J］. Science of the Total Environment，2021，785:147236.
[26]	ZHANG S，WEI Z，WANG Y，et al. Sentiment analysis of Chinese micro-blog text based on extended sentiment dictionary［J］. Future Generation Computer Systems，2018，81:395-403.
[27]	YADOLLAHI A，SHAHRAKI A G，ZAIANE O R. Current state of text sentiment analysis from opinion to emotion mining［J］. ACM Computing Surveys（CSUR），2017，50（2）:1-33.
[28]	YANG J，ZHOU Q，LIU X，et al. Biased perception misguided by affect:how does emotional experience lead to incorrect judgments about environmental quality？［J］. Global Environmental Change，2018，53:104-113.
[29]	TAPIO P. Towards a theory of decoupling:degrees of decoupling in the EU and the case of road traffic in Finland between 1970 and 2001［J］. Transport Policy，2005，12（2）:37-151.
[30]	Chengdu Municipal Ecology and Environment Bureau Prevention and control of air pollution［EB/OL］.（2024-01-14）［2024-06-21］. https://sthj.chengdu.gov.cn/cdhbj/c169812/zwgk_dqwr.shtml. 成都市生态环境局. 大气污染防治［EB/OL］.（2024-01-14）［2024-06-21］. https://sthj.chengdu.gov.cn/cdhbj/c169812/zwgk_dqwr.shtml.
[31]	ZHANG Y，WU W，LI Y，et al. An investigation of PM_2.5 concentration changes in Mid-Eastern China before and after COVID-19 outbreak［J］. Environment International，2023（175）:107941.
[32]	WU W，WANG W，ZHANG L，et al. Does the public haze pollution concern expressed on online platforms promoted pollution control？ Evidence from Chinese online platforms［J］. Journal of Cleaner Production，2021，318:128477.
[33]	MOUSAVINEZHAD S，CHOI Y，POUYAEI A，et al. A comprehensive investigation of surface ozone pollution in China，2015—2019:separating the contributions from meteorology and precursor emissions［J］. Atmospheric Research，2021，257:105599.
[34]	WANG J，YANG Y，ZHANG Y，et al. Influence of meteorological conditions on explosive increase in O₃ concentration in troposphere［J］. Science of the Total Environment，2019，652:1228-1241.
[35]	FENG Y，ZHAO L X，LIU B Y，et al. Current situation and suggestion for air pollution emission control of steel industry in Guanxi［J］. Environmental Engineering，2024，42（6）:63-70. 冯媛，赵侣璇，刘冰燕，等. 广西钢铁行业大气污染治理现状及控制对策建议［J］. 环境工程，2024，42（6）:63-70.
[36]	Chengdu Bureau of Statistics. Chengdu statistical yearbook 2024［M］. Beijing:China Statistics Press，2024. 成都市统计局. 成都统计年鉴2024［M］. 北京:中国统计出版社，2024.