DRIVING MECHANISM OF WETLAND LANDSCAPE PATTERN AND ECOSYSTEM SERVICES IN WUHAN

LIANG Fangyuan; LI Peng; CHENG Weijin; XIAO Zhiyan; LI Xiaowen; LV Jiangtao; MA Tiantian

doi:10.13205/j.hjgc.202301013

Volume 41 Issue 1

Jan. 2023

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Article Navigation > ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING > 2023 > 41(1): 105-111

LIANG Fangyuan, LI Peng, CHENG Weijin, XIAO Zhiyan, LI Xiaowen, LV Jiangtao, MA Tiantian. DRIVING MECHANISM OF WETLAND LANDSCAPE PATTERN AND ECOSYSTEM SERVICES IN WUHAN[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2023, 41(1): 105-111. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202301013

Citation:

LIANG Fangyuan, LI Peng, CHENG Weijin, XIAO Zhiyan, LI Xiaowen, LV Jiangtao, MA Tiantian. DRIVING MECHANISM OF WETLAND LANDSCAPE PATTERN AND ECOSYSTEM SERVICES IN WUHAN[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2023, 41(1): 105-111. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202301013

Citation:

PDF( 3328 KB)

DRIVING MECHANISM OF WETLAND LANDSCAPE PATTERN AND ECOSYSTEM SERVICES IN WUHAN

doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202301013

1. Nanjing Institute of Environmental Sciences, MEE, Nanjing 210018, China;
2. Wuhan Wetland Protection Center, Wuhan 430000, China;
3. School of Environment, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China;
4. Environmental Protection Research and Monitoring Institute, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Tianjin 300000, China

Received Date: 2022-05-24
Available Online: 2023-03-23

Abstract

Abstract

This research aims at the demand for wetland ecology protection and restoration in Wuhan under the background of fast development of urbanization to reveal the spatio-temporal evolution law and key driving mechanism of wetlands. In this study, we first analyzed the spatiotemporal dynamics and driving processes trajectories of change of wetland landscape pattern in Wuhan from 1980 to 2020, and used the InVEST model to simulate the spatiotemporal changes in those key ecosystem services of the wetlands. The results showed that the ecosystem services of habitat quality, carbon storage, flood regulation, and landscape culture of Wuhan decreased by 17.75%, 2.28%, 0.49%, and 4.10% by 2020. Single human driving process trajectories of fishery breeding and reclamation led to damage to natural wetlands, while rehabilitation measures of returning farmland to wetlands contributed to the improvement of ecosystem services. Reclamation was the main driving process that decreased flood regulation and habitat quality services, and the core driving process that decreased carbon storage functions and landscape cultural functions was fishery breeding. The research identified the threats to wetland ecosystems to propose long-term wetland protection countermeasures and planning.
- wetlands,
- landscape pattern,
- ecosystem service,
- driving process,
- trajectory analysis

FullText(HTML)

References(35)

References

[1]	李晓文, 李梦迪, 梁晨, 等. 湿地恢复若干问题探讨[J]. 自然资源学报, 2014, 29(7):1258-1269.
[2]	张慧, 李智, 刘光, 等. 中国城市湿地研究进展[J]. 湿地科学, 2016, 14(1):103-107.
[3]	MAO D H, LUO L, WANG Z M, et al. Conversions between natural wetlands and farmland in China:a multiscale geospatial analysis[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2018, 634:550-560.
[4]	严思睿, 刘强, 孙涛, 等. 湿地生态水文过程及其模拟研究进展[J]. 湿地科学, 2021, 19(1):98-105.
[5]	傅伯杰, 张立伟. 土地利用变化与生态系统服务:概念、方法与进展[J]. 地理科学进展, 2014, 33(4):441-446.
[6]	毛齐正, 黄甘霖, 邬建国.城市生态系统服务研究综述[J].应用生态学报, 2015, 26(4):1023-1033.
[7]	WATSON S J, LUCK G W, SPOONER P G, et al. Land-use change:incorporating the frequency, sequence, time span, and magnitude of changes into ecological research[J]. Frontiers in Ecology & the Environment, 2016, 12(4):241-249.
[8]	吴胜男, 王晓锋, 刘婷婷, 等. 基于CiteSpace的湿地恢复研究进展及热点演变分析[J]. 生态学报, 2022, 42(3):1-17.
[9]	QUINTERO-GALLEGO, QUINTERO-ANGEL M, JOSÉ JOAQUÍN VILA-ORTEGA. Exploring land use/land cover change and drivers in Andean mountains in Colombia:a case in rural Quindío[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2018, 634:1288-1299.
[10]	孙梦华, 牛文浩, 张蚌蚌, 等. 黄河流域土地利用变化下生态系统服务价值时空演变及其响应:以陕甘宁地区为例[J]. 应用生态学报, 2021, 32(11):3913-3922.
[11]	吕金霞, 蒋卫国, 王文杰, 等. 近30年来京津冀地区湿地景观变化及其驱动因素[J]. 生态学报, 2018, 38(12):4492-4503.
[12]	陈万旭, 刘志玲, 李江风, 等. 长江中游城市群生态系统服务和城镇化之间的空间关系研究[J]. 生态学报, 2020, 40(15):5137-5150.
[13]	马田田. 围垦开发下黄河三角洲受损滨海湿地修复系统优化与调控研究[D]. 北京:北京师范大学, 2019.
[14]	智烈慧, 李心, 马田田, 等. 辽河三角洲土地利用变化轨迹、驱动过程及生态系统服务时空演变[J]. 环境科学学报, 2022, 42(1):141-150.
[15]	ZOMLOT Z, VERBEIREN B, HUYSMANS M, et al. Trajectory analysis of land use and land cover maps to improve spatial-temporal patterns, and impact assessment on groundwater recharge[J]. Journal of Hydrology, 2017, 554:558-569.
[16]	MA T J, LI X W, BAI J H, et al. Tracking three decades of land use and land cover transformation trajectories in China's large river deltas[J]. Land Degradation and Development, 2019, 30(7):799-810.
[17]	谢启姣, 刘进华. 1987-2016年武汉城市湖泊时空演变及其生态服务价值响应[J]. 生态学报, 2020, 40(21):7840-7850.
[18]	何建华, 潘越, 刘殿锋. 生态网络视角下武汉市湿地生态格局分析[J]. 生态学报, 2020, 40(11):3590-3601.
[19]	TEIXEIRA Z, TEIXEIRA H, MARQUES J C. Systematic processes of land use/land cover change to identify relevant driving forces:implications on water quality[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2014, 470:1320-1335.
[20]	彭凯锋, 蒋卫国, 邓越. 武汉城市圈湿地受损程度识别及驱动因素分析[J]. 自然资源学报, 2019, 34(8):1694-1707.
[21]	刘威, 胡超超, 伊剑锋, 等. 青头潜鸭种群状况及其潜在适宜生境分布[J]. 湿地科学, 2020, 18(4):387-396.
[22]	谢鹏. 东方白鹳(Ciconia boyciana)不同时期栖息地生境比较研究[D]. 哈尔滨:东北林业大学, 2018.
[23]	徐睿泽, 高健峰. 莫莫格湿地景观变化及对白鹤生境的影响[J]. 野生动物学报, 2021, 42(1):106-113.
[24]	柯新利, 唐兰萍. 城市扩张与耕地保护耦合对陆地生态系统碳储量的影响:以湖北省为例[J]. 生态学报, 2019, 39(2):672-683.
[25]	周文昌, 史玉虎, 潘磊, 等. 基于固碳服务价值评价的洪湖湿地保护对策[J]. 湿地科学与管理, 2017, 13(4):8-11.
[26]	季淮. 洪泽湖河湖交汇区不同土地覆被/利用类型土壤有机碳分布特征及其影响因素[D]. 南京:南京林业大学, 2021.
[27]	赵欣胜, 崔丽娟, 李伟, 等. 吉林省湿地调蓄洪水功能分析及其价值评估[J]. 水资源保护, 2016, 32(7):27-33.
[28]	饶恩明, 肖燚, 欧阳志云. 中国湖库洪水调蓄功能评价[J]. 自然资源学报, 2014, 29(8):1356-1365.
[29]	董连耕, 朱文博, 高阳, 等. 生态系统文化服务研究进展[J]. 北京大学学报(自然科学版), 2014, 50(6):1155-1162.
[30]	谢高地, 张彩霞, 张雷明, 等. 基于单位面积价值当量因子的生态系统服务价值化方法改进[J]. 自然资源学报, 2015, 30(8):1243-1254.
[31]	COSTANZA R, GROOT R D, BRAAT L, et al. Twenty years of ecosystem services:how far have we come and how far do we still need to go?[J]. Ecosystem Services, 2017, 28(A):1-16.
[32]	CHEN W X, ZHAO H B, LI J F, et al. Land use transitions and the associated impacts on ecosystem services in the Middle Reaches of the Yangtze River Economic Belt in China based on the geo-informatic Tupu method[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2020, 701:134690.
[33]	汪迎春, 赵玉连, 张志麒, 等. 几种典型湿地的生态现状与修复策略[J]. 湿地科学与管理, 2020, 16(1):34-37.
[34]	CAO Y N, KONG L Q, ZHANG L F, et al. Spatial characteristics of ecological degradation and restoration in China from 2000 to 2015 using remote sensing:ecological degradation and restoration in China[J]. Restoration Ecology, 2020, 28(6):1419-1430.
[35]	GAGLIO M, ASCHONITIS V G, GISSI E, et al. Land use change effects on ecosystem services of river deltas and coastal wetlands:case study in Volano-Mesola-Goro in Poriver delta (Italy)[J]. Wetlands Ecology & Management, 2017, 25(1):67-86.