Source Journal of CSCD
Source Journal for Chinese Scientific and Technical Papers
Core Journal of RCCSE
Included in JST China
Volume 41 Issue 7
Jul.  2023
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
YAN Mengfan, LONG Jisheng. A COMPREHENSIVE EVALUATION METHOD OF WASTE INCINERATION POWER PLANT BASED ON DELPHI METHOD AND TOPSIS METHOD[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2023, 41(7): 229-234. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202307031
Citation: YAN Mengfan, LONG Jisheng. A COMPREHENSIVE EVALUATION METHOD OF WASTE INCINERATION POWER PLANT BASED ON DELPHI METHOD AND TOPSIS METHOD[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2023, 41(7): 229-234. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202307031

A COMPREHENSIVE EVALUATION METHOD OF WASTE INCINERATION POWER PLANT BASED ON DELPHI METHOD AND TOPSIS METHOD

doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202307031
  • Received Date: 2022-09-26
  • The current evaluation standard of domestic waste incineration plants is based on the project construction level and operation management level of the evaluation object. Then comprehensive scoring method is conducted according to the different weights of the two dimensions. Due to the large differences in design parameters between waste incineration power plants, the existing evaluation methods are mainly based on design parameters, and the evaluation objects are evaluated by experts. Index selection doesn't consider the weights from the perspective of energy efficiency and environmental protection indicators, and the expert scoring also has strong subjectivity. Therefore, the evaluation results are one-sided sometimes. By using the Delphi and TOPSIS method and combining them reasonably, this paper gave a comprehensive evaluation method from the aspects of index determination, index evaluation and ranking different planets. First, using the Delphi method, the evaluation indicators were determined from the perspective of energy efficiency and environmental protection, so that the evaluation dimensions gave consideration to both economic and social aspects. Then, using Delphi method, experts ranked the evaluation objects according to the determined evaluation indicators to give the subjective score. The deviation between the actual evaluation index and the ideal solution was objectively scored by the TOPSIS method. The final comprehensive score was calculated according to the different weights of subjective and objective evaluations. This method was proposed to evaluate the operation of multiple waste incineration plants and provide a subjective and objective ranking. It can provide new scoring ideas for the revision of the current evaluation standards for domestic waste incineration plants.
  • loading
  • [1]
    中华人民共和国住房和城乡建设部.《2020年城乡建设统计年鉴》[R/OL].2021.http://www.mohurd.gov.cn/file/2021/20211012/dae27f9eb22debfd6d1e7965040b76ff.zip?n=2020%E5%B9%B4%E5%9F%8E%E4%B9%A1%E5%BB%BA%E8%AE%BE%E7%BB%9F%E8%AE%A1%E5%B9%B4%E9%89%B4.
    [2]
    焦学军, 张桂仙, 沈咏烈,等.中国垃圾焚烧发电政策回顾与分析[J].环境卫生工程, 2020,28(6):57-65.
    [3]
    中华人民共和国住房和城乡建设部.生活垃圾焚烧厂评价标准:CJJ/T 137-2010[S].北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2010.
    [4]
    孙志春.基于系统稳定性的燃煤发电机组综合对标评价方法研究与实践[J].热力发电,2021, 50(3):77-83.
    [5]
    陈坚红, 盛德仁, 李蔚,等.火电厂工程多目标综合评价模型[J].中国电机工程学报, 2002, 22(12):152-154.
    [6]
    刘延泉,王帅.基于熵权TOPSIS法的电厂运营指标评价[J].电力科学与工程, 2016, 32(7):39-43.
    [7]
    刘娟.基于熵权TOPSIS法的农村垃圾资源化处理PPP项目风险分担研究[J].中国管理信息化, 2020, 23(10):63-66.
    [8]
    朱天瞳,丁坚勇,郑旭.基于改进TOPSIS法和德尔菲-熵权综合权重法的电网规划方案综合决策方法[J].电力系统保护与控制,2018, 46(12):91-99.
    [9]
    BOLGER F, WRIGHT G.Improving the Delphi process:lessons from social psychological research[J].Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 2011, 78(9):1500-1513.
    [10]
    WANG H C L,YEON K S.Multiple attribute decision making[M].Berlin:Springer-verlag,1981.
    [11]
    青井透.廃棄物処理施設長寿命化計画作成の手引き(ごみ焼却施設編)[M].日本,环境省废弃物对策课, 2010.
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Article Metrics

    Article views (118) PDF downloads(4) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return