EVALUATION OF ENTROPY INCREASE INHIBITION EFFECT OF TREATMENT OF INFERIOR V-CLASS WATER BODIES IN TYPICAL RURAL RIVER COURSES

GU Yonggang; YU Lei; ZHANG Shuhan; MENG Qingyi

doi:10.13205/j.hjgc.202402015

Volume 42 Issue 2

Feb. 2024

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Article Navigation > ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING > 2024 > 42(2): 128-134

GU Yonggang, YU Lei, ZHANG Shuhan, MENG Qingyi. EVALUATION OF ENTROPY INCREASE INHIBITION EFFECT OF TREATMENT OF INFERIOR V-CLASS WATER BODIES IN TYPICAL RURAL RIVER COURSES[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2024, 42(2): 128-134. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202402015

Citation:

GU Yonggang, YU Lei, ZHANG Shuhan, MENG Qingyi. EVALUATION OF ENTROPY INCREASE INHIBITION EFFECT OF TREATMENT OF INFERIOR V-CLASS WATER BODIES IN TYPICAL RURAL RIVER COURSES[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2024, 42(2): 128-134. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202402015

Citation:

GU Yonggang, YU Lei, ZHANG Shuhan, MENG Qingyi. EVALUATION OF ENTROPY INCREASE INHIBITION EFFECT OF TREATMENT OF INFERIOR V-CLASS WATER BODIES IN TYPICAL RURAL RIVER COURSES[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2024, 42(2): 128-134. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202402015

PDF( 2806 KB)

EVALUATION OF ENTROPY INCREASE INHIBITION EFFECT OF TREATMENT OF INFERIOR V-CLASS WATER BODIES IN TYPICAL RURAL RIVER COURSES

doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202402015

GU Yonggang^{1,2
,
,},
YU Lei^1,3,
ZHANG Shuhan^1,3,
MENG Qingyi^1,2,3

1. Beijing Water Science and Technology Institute, Beijing 100048, China;
2. Beijing Key Laboratory of Watershed Water Environment and Ecological Technology, Beijing 100048, China;
3. Beijing Key Laboratory of Urban Water Cycle and Sponge City Technology, Beijing 100048, China

Received Date: 2022-11-20
Available Online: 2024-04-28

Abstract

Abstract

The issue of water pollution and environmental deterioration caused by insufficient processing capacity sewage treatment in rural areas is a critical problem that requires immediate attention. The current rate of urbanization has led to severe neglect of the construction of sewage treatment facilities in rural areas, causing the direct injection of untreated sewage into rivers. Source control, pollution interception, collection, and treatment are essential methods for controlling the pollution of Inferior V-class water bodies. In this paper, we conducted an in-depth analysis on the csuse of the inferior V-class water bodies in typical rural river water, expanded and upgraded rural sewage treatment facilities, and introduced the concept of entropy, to analyze the impact of organic matter, nitrogen, and phosphorus reduction on water environment and emission reduction effect. After upgrading rural sewage treatment facilities from 800 m³/d to 1800 m³/d, the water environment of typical river channels was effectively improved, and the annual entropy increase was reduced by 9.80×10⁷ kJ/K. The stability of the river water environment and water ecosystem depends on maintaining a relative balance between entropy increase and reverse entropy increase. Evaluating the increase in entropy has practical significance for upgrading and renovating sewage plants and controlling the effect of overflow pollution. In the current context of carbon emissions, carbon neutrality, and the treatment of Inferior V-class water bodies, the sustainable treatment of sewage under the concept of entropy will be excepted to be a development focus of new technology evaluation.

FullText(HTML)

References(48)

References

[1]	国务院.国务院关于印发水污染防治行动计划的通知[R].北京:中华人民共和国中央人民政府,2015.4.
[2]	市水务局举行两个“三年行动方案”新闻通报会[EB/OL].http://swj.beijing.gov.cn/swdt/swyw/202302/t20230217_2918681.html.2023-02-17.
[3]	全国人大财政经济委员会,国家发展和改革委员会.中华人民共和国国民经济和社会发展第十四个五年规划和2035年远景目标纲要[M].北京:中国计划出版社,2022.
[4]	陈吉宁.2021年北京市人民政府工作报告[R].北京:北京市第十五届人民代表大会第四次会议,2022.1 https://www.beijing.gov.cn/gongkai/jihua/zfgzbg/202102/t20210201_2249908. html.
[5]	中共北京市委办公厅、北京市人民政府办公厅.关于进一步强化河(湖)长制工作的实施意见[R].北京:北京市人民政府,2023.1 https://www.beijing.gov.cn/zhengce/zhengcefagui/202301/t20230110_2894772. html.
[6]	胡明,王培京,邱彦昭,等.基于经济性评价的北京市平原区农村污水治理模式优化研究[J].环境科学学报,2021,41(1):133-142.
[7]	北京市生态环境局、北京市市场监督管理局.农村生活污水处理设施水污染物排放标准:DB11/1612—2019[S].北京:北京市生态环境局,北京市市场监督管理局,2019.
[8]	北京市环境保护局,北京市质量技术监督局.水污染物综合排放标准:DB11/307—2013[S].北京:中国标准出版社,2013.
[9]	陈明霞,熊贵耀,张佳鹏,等.湘江流域水质综合评价及其时空演变分析[J].环境工程,2019,37(10):83-90 ,104.
[10]	景胜元,徐明德,武春芳.汾河水库、上游水质分析及其污染防治措施[J].环境工程,2014,32(4):18-21.
[11]	陈辉,顾建辉,李治源.不同水质评价方法在城市河道水质评价中的应用比较[J].苏州科技大学学报(工程技术版),2017,30(1):42-46.
[12]	刘颖.浙江省“剿灭劣Ⅴ类水”成果评价研究[J].浙江水利水电学院学报,2021,33(1):11-15 ,27.
[13]	傅金祥,陈喆,马兴冠,等.改良模糊综合评价法在水质评价中的应用[J].环境工程,2011,29(6):120-123 ,127.
[14]	董瑞,李霞.基于PSR-模糊综合评价方法的天津市水环境安全评价[J].天津理工大学学报,2021,37(6):53-57.
[15]	徐光宇,柴国平,徐明德,等.主成分分析法在汾河太原城区段水质评价中的应用[J].环境工程,2014,32(6):122-124 ,113.
[16]	王成杰,张森.基于主成分和粒子群优化支持向量机的水质评价模型[J].环境工程学报,2014,8(10):4545-4549.
[17]	刘贤梅,周忠发,张昊天,等.基于主成分分析的喀斯特山区河流水质评价及水质时空特征分析:以贵州省张维河为例[J].环境工程,2019,37(10):49-54 ,132.
[18]	杜书栋,关亚楠,李欣,等.基于熵权法改进的综合污染指数的水质评价:以白云湖为例[J]环境科学学报,2006,(6):205-212.
[19]	王丽琼.基于熵权的属性识别模型在湖泊水质富营养化评价中的应用[J].环境工程,2006,24(5):69-71 ,88.
[20]	王勇.房山区农村生活污水处理效果与后评价[D].北京:中国农业大学,2017.
[21]	潘湛昌,魏志钢,胡光辉,等.熵增加原理与科学发展[J].价值工程,2011,30 (31):251-253.
[22]	LUDOVISI A,POLETTI A.Use of thermodynamic indices as ecological indicators of the development state of lake ecosystems.1.Entropy production indices[J].Ecological Modelling,2003,159(2/3):203-222.
[23]	STEINBORN W,SVIREZHEV Y.Entropy as an indicator of sustainability in agro-ecosystems:north Germany case study[J].Ecological Modelling,2000,133(3):247-257.
[24]	SVIREZHEV Y M.Thermodynamics and ecology[J].Ecological Modelling,2000,132(1-2):11-22.
[25]	AOKI I.Holological study of lakes from an entropy viewpoint-lake Mendota[J].Ecological Modelling,1989,45(2):81-93.
[26]	陈小红,汤德梅.水库水体底质界面污染物交换的熵描述[J].中山大学学报(自然科学版),1998(增刊2):5-8.
[27]	ARMANDO G M,ALEJANDRO Z A,BÁRBARA G R,et al.On an exergy efficiency definition of a wastewater treatment plant[J].International Journal of Thermodynamics,2003,6(4):169-176.
[28]	RITTMANN B E,MCCARTY P L.Environmental biotechnology:principles and applications[M].McGraw-Hill Education,2001.
[29]	MCCARTY P L.Thermodynamic electron equivalents model for bacterial yield prediction:modifications and comparative evaluations[J].Biotechnology and Bioengineering,2007,97(2):377-388.
[30]	国家环境保护总局,国家质量监督检验检疫总局.中华人民共和国地标水环境质量标准:GB 3838—2002[S].北京:中国标准出版社,2002.
[31]	国家环境保护总局《水和废水监测分析方法》编委会编.水和废水监测分析方法(第四版)[M].北京:中国环境科学出版社,2002.
[32]	中华人民共和国国家质量监督检验检疫总局,中国国家标准化管理委员会.污水排入城镇下水道水质标准:GB/T 31962—2015[S].北京:中国标准出版社,2016.
[33]	北京市环境保护局、北京市质量技术监督局.城镇污水处理厂水污染物综合排放标准:DB11/890—2012[S].北京:中国标准出版社,2012.
[34]	李静,沈梦兰,何立山,等.不同水质目标下居延海(东)水环境容量分析[J].中国环境监测,2022,38(3):120-125.
[35]	孙雪梅,何琦,王萌萌.污水厂尾水受纳水体水环境容量分析[J].山东水利,2021(9):51-52,55.
[36]	薛爽,赵庆良,魏亮亮.二级处理出水中有机物的分级特性[J].哈尔滨工业大学学报,2008,40(8):1208-1213.
[37]	罗丽.TOC和氮磷对水环境影响的熵增评价方法研究[D].西安:西安建筑科技大学,2013.
[38]	房慧德,赵炎,李现瑾,等.农村生活污水处理设施尾水中TOC与COD相关性研究[J].环境保护与循环经济,2020,40(12):25-28.
[39]	陈芳,徐建芬,王昂,等.杭州市主要污水处理厂TOC与COD关联分析[J].环境科学导刊,2018,37(3):75-78.
[40]	南海涛,曾杰,王新霞.城市污水中TOC与COD的关系[J].中国给水排水,2002,18(6):80-81.
[41]	BEAL C M,HEBNER R E,WEBBER M E.Thermodynamic analysis of algal biocrude production[J].Energy,2012,44(1):925-943.
[42]	邵骏,杜涛,郭卫,等.金沙江上游河段水温变化规律及其影响因素探讨[J].长江科学院院报,2022,39(8):17-22 ,28.
[43]	CLARK E,WEBB B W,LADLE M.Microthermal gradients and ecological implications in Dorset rivers[J].Hydrological Processes,1999,13(3):423-438.
[44]	HAO X D,WU D Q,LI J,et al.Making waves:a sea change in treating wastewater-why thermodynamics supports resource recovery and recycling[J].Water Research,2022,218:1-5.
[45]	陈曦,罗小玲.污染熵及其在污染物降解过程中的应用[J].环境工程,2010,28(增刊1):410-413.
[46]	崔键,杜易,丁程成,等.中国湖泊水体磷的赋存形态及污染治理措施进展[J].生态环境学报,2022,31(3):621-633.
[47]	黄娟,安艳玲,吴起鑫.清水江流域水体中氮磷分布及富营养化程度评价[J].环境工程,2016,34 (5):143-147.
[48]	楚想想.基于热力学熵增的污水回用效果评价[D].西安:西安建筑科技大学,2017.